TheShrike
- 44
- 1
In Elements of the Theory of Functions and Functional Analysis (Kolmogorov and Fomin) the definitions are as follows:
An open sphere S(x_0,r) in a metric space R (with metric function \rho(x,y)) is the set of all points x\in R satisfying \rho(x,x_0)<r. The fixed point x_0 is called the center; the number r is called the radius.
An ε-neighbourhood of the point x, denoted O(x,\epsilon), is an open sphere of radius ε and center x_0.
How is the ε-neighbourhood a significant definition? It seems to be just the open sphere with a different radius symbol. If we have a neighbourhood of a point x (as per the definition) does this x have to lie within the open sphere? I mean, I assume it must, but this doesn't seem to be captured by the definition. What am I missing?
Thanks.
An open sphere S(x_0,r) in a metric space R (with metric function \rho(x,y)) is the set of all points x\in R satisfying \rho(x,x_0)<r. The fixed point x_0 is called the center; the number r is called the radius.
An ε-neighbourhood of the point x, denoted O(x,\epsilon), is an open sphere of radius ε and center x_0.
How is the ε-neighbourhood a significant definition? It seems to be just the open sphere with a different radius symbol. If we have a neighbourhood of a point x (as per the definition) does this x have to lie within the open sphere? I mean, I assume it must, but this doesn't seem to be captured by the definition. What am I missing?
Thanks.