Difference between open sphere and epsilon-neighbourhood - Metric Spaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the definitions of open spheres and ε-neighbourhoods in metric spaces as presented in "Elements of the Theory of Functions and Functional Analysis" by Kolmogorov and Fomin. An open sphere S(x_0,r) is defined as the set of points x in a metric space R such that the distance ρ(x,x_0) is less than r, with x_0 as the center and r as the radius. An ε-neighbourhood O(x,ε) is specifically an open sphere centered at x with radius ε. The confusion arises from the notation, where it is emphasized that the ε-neighbourhood must be centered at the point x, not x_0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and metric functions
  • Familiarity with the concepts of open spheres and open balls
  • Knowledge of notation used in mathematical analysis
  • Basic principles of topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of metric spaces in detail
  • Learn about the implications of open balls in topology
  • Explore the differences between open and closed sets in metric spaces
  • Investigate the role of ε-neighbourhoods in convergence and continuity
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of analysis, and anyone studying topology or metric spaces will benefit from this discussion, particularly those seeking clarity on the definitions and applications of open spheres and ε-neighbourhoods.

TheShrike
Messages
44
Reaction score
1
In Elements of the Theory of Functions and Functional Analysis (Kolmogorov and Fomin) the definitions are as follows:

An open sphere S(x_0,r) in a metric space R (with metric function \rho(x,y)) is the set of all points x\in R satisfying \rho(x,x_0)<r. The fixed point x_0 is called the center; the number r is called the radius.

An ε-neighbourhood of the point x, denoted O(x,\epsilon), is an open sphere of radius ε and center x_0.

How is the ε-neighbourhood a significant definition? It seems to be just the open sphere with a different radius symbol. If we have a neighbourhood of a point x (as per the definition) does this x have to lie within the open sphere? I mean, I assume it must, but this doesn't seem to be captured by the definition. What am I missing?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheShrike said:
In Elements of the Theory of Functions and Functional Analysis (Kolmogorov and Fomin) the definitions are as follows:

An open sphere S(x_0,r) in a metric space R (with metric function \rho(x,y)) is the set of all points x\in R satisfying \rho(x,x_0)<r. The fixed point x_0 is called the center; the number r is called the radius.

An ε-neighbourhood of the point x, denoted O(x,\epsilon), is an open sphere of radius ε and center x_0.
No. an \epsilon-neighborhood of the point x is open sphere with radius \epsilon and center x, not some x_0 (that wouldn't make sense because x_0 is not mentioned in the notation "O(x, \epsilon)").

How is the ε-neighbourhood a significant definition? It seems to be just the open sphere with a different radius symbol. If we have a neighbourhood of a point x (as per the definition) does this x have to lie within the open sphere? I mean, I assume it must, but this doesn't seem to be captured by the definition. What am I missing?

Thanks.
An "\epsilon-neighborhood of x" is specifically the open ball of radius \epsilon with radius \epsilon that is centered at x.
 
An ε-neighbourhood of the point x, denoted O(x,ϵ), is an open sphere of radius ε and center x0.

I think this should read

An ε-neighbourhood of the point x, denoted O(x,ϵ), is an open sphere of radius ε and center x.

I have bolded the difference.

I prefer the term open ball to open sphere however.

edit I see Halls of ivy just beat me.

:biggrin:
 
Studiot said:
I think this should read

An ε-neighbourhood of the point x, denoted O(x,ϵ), is an open sphere of radius ε and center x.

I have bolded the difference.

I prefer the term open ball to open sphere however.

edit I see Halls of ivy just beat me.

:biggrin:
Yahoo!:-p
 
That's as I suspected. There must be a typo in the book.

Suddenly it all makes sense. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K