Difference between Strong Induction and Mathematical Induction?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between Mathematical Induction and Strong Induction, particularly focusing on their definitions and perceived ease of use in proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore whether Mathematical Induction is easier than Strong Induction, with some referencing external resources for clarification. There are attempts to define the two types of induction and discuss their equivalence and application in various proofs.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes differing opinions on the ease of use of each induction method, with some participants suggesting that the context of the problem may influence which method is more straightforward. Guidance is offered regarding the understanding of both types of induction, but no consensus is reached on their comparative ease.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the definitions and assumptions surrounding the two types of induction, noting that the original poster's source claims they are identical, which is contested in the discussion.

phillyolly
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Explain the difference between The principle of Mathematical Induction and The principle of Strong Induction. One is easier than the other. Why?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My book says that they are in fact identical. Proofs are almost the same...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that true that Mathematical Induction is easier to use VS Complete (or Strong) Induction?
 
i've only really used the basic induction... but I suppose it would depend on the problem though
 
Depends on how you define "easy." If you read the section on the wiki article that lanedance posted, you'll see that Complete Induction actually makes many proofs (e.g. theorems based on Fibonacci numbers where recursion is necessary) much 'easier.' It makes sense since recursion falls back onto previous cases, and strong induction already assumes these to be true. I'd get comfortable with both types of induction if I were you.
 
With simple induction you use "if p(k) is true then p(k+1) is true" while in strong induction you use "if p(i) is true for all i less than or equal to k then p(k+1) is true", where p(k) is some statement depending on the positive integer k.

They are NOT "identical" but they are equivalent.

It is easy to see that if simple induction is true then strong induction is true: if you know that statement p(i) is true for all i less than or equal to k, then you know that it is true, in particular, for i= k and can use simple induction.

It is harder to prove, but still true, that if strong induction is true, then simple induction is true. That is what we mean by "equivalent".
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K