Difference in Potential Energy between two Reservoirs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the increase in specific potential energy when water is pumped from one reservoir to another, with a height difference of 20m and a horizontal distance of 100m. The relevant equation is P = mgh, where the change in potential energy (ΔP) is derived from the height difference (Δh). The correct calculation yields ΔP/Δm = gΔh = 980 J/kg, emphasizing that only the vertical height contributes to potential energy changes, not the horizontal distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential energy concepts, specifically gravitational potential energy.
  • Familiarity with the equation P = mgh for calculating potential energy.
  • Basic knowledge of physics principles related to mass, gravity, and height.
  • Ability to perform unit conversions and calculations involving Joules and kilograms.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of gravitational potential energy in detail.
  • Learn about the implications of height differences in energy calculations.
  • Explore the application of potential energy in renewable energy systems.
  • Review physics problems involving energy conservation and transformations.
USEFUL FOR

Students in renewable energy courses, physics learners, and anyone interested in understanding potential energy calculations in practical scenarios.

catsandtrees
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3. Water is pumped from one reservoir to another 100m away. The water level in the second reservoir is 20m above the water level of the first reservoir. What is the increase in specific potential energy of the water in J/kg?


Homework Equations



The relevant equation I've been given in my notes is

P = mgh

This problem is for a renewable energy course. In class I only received a definition of potential energy and the above equation, the teacher didn't do any problems with potential energy in class either. The given textbook doesn't touch on the quantitative side of renewable energies. I've been trying to look through old physics textbooks but can't find anything too helpful yet.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have been away from physics for almost 8 years, so physics problems aren't very intuitive for me anymore.

So far I've assumed I'm calculating the change in P. Setting up the equation as :
ΔP = (mgh)2nd reservoir - (mgh)1st reservoir

with
Δ (mass*g) = (20m* ? * density of water)*9.8m^2/sec
Δh = 100m

I can't figure out how to get the Δ in the volume of water, which I need to get the mass. Or since the teacher wants the answer in J/kg, should I be assuming that I should set up the equation as:
ΔP/m = Δ(g*h) ?

Any help would be great.
Thanks,
Alyssa
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to PF!

catsandtrees said:
So far I've assumed I'm calculating the change in P. Setting up the equation as :
ΔP = (mgh)2nd reservoir - (mgh)1st reservoir

Yes. This is very good.

Note that you can write this as ΔP = mgh2 - mgh1 = mg(h2 - h1) = mgΔh.

You can imagine that you skim a mass of m = 1 kg of water off the surface of the first reservoir and move it to the surface of the second reservoir. You just need to calculate ΔP for this situation.
 
I attempted the question again keeping in mind I need the specific potential energy.
This would give me:

ΔP/Δm = gΔh = 9.80 * 100m = 980 m2/s2 = 980 J/kg.

However this doesn't use the 20m water level difference. At this point in the course I don't think the teacher would give us useless info. Does this mean I need to use a trig function to get actual difference in height? Or should I be incorporating the 20m into the Δm?
 
In the equation P = mgh, h is the vertical height. So, Δh is the change in vertical height, or the change in water level of the two reservoirs. There is no change in gravitational potential energy when a mass is moved horizontally. You can think of moving 1 kg of mass 100 m horizontally and then 20 m vertically. Only the 20 m vertical change contributes to the change in potential energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
12
Views
10K
Replies
55
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K