Difference/similarity between superposition and uncertainty

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
entropy1
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
72
What is the relation between "superposition" and "the Heisenberg uncertainty relation"?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the quantum state of a system [itex]|\psi\rangle[/itex] is expressed as a sum over multiple eigenstates of an observable [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex], we say that the system is in a superposition of these different eigenstates (where each eigenstate corresponds to a particular possible measurement outcome of [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex]). Depending on the particular superposition, you could be almost equally likely to measure any outcome of [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex] (maximum uncertainty), or have one outcome's probability be much larger than the others (minimum uncertainty).

If [itex]|\psi\rangle[/itex] happens to be in a single eigenstate of [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex], then when you measure [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex], you will get exactly the outcome associated to that eigenstate with 100 percent probability. In this case, the uncertainty in [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex] is zero, since you know exactly what your measurement outcome would be.

However, just as [itex]|\psi\rangle[/itex] can be expressed as a sum over the eigenstates of [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex], it can also be expressed as a different sum over the different eigenstates of another observable [itex]\hat{R}[/itex].

The uncertainty principle comes into play for observable pairs [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex] and [itex]\hat{R}[/itex] where there is no eigenstate of [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex] that is also an eigenstate of [itex]\hat{R}[/itex]. When that happens, there is no quantum state [itex]|\psi\rangle[/itex] where you will be able to predict the measurement outcome of both [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex] and [itex]\hat{R}[/itex] with 100 percent certainty.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and entropy1
Thank you very much for the explanation! :smile: To get this clear: is the Heisenberg uncertainty relation equal to this general form, or is it specific to impulse and position?
 
entropy1 said:
Thank you very much for the explanation! :smile: To get this clear: is the Heisenberg uncertainty relation equal to this general form, or is it specific to impulse and position?

The Heisenberg relation was originally expressed in terms of position and momentum, but it wasn't long before it was defined for general pairs of observables (where the position-momentum pair is a special case).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: entropy1
Is the superposition of eigenstates called a "mixed state"?
jfizzix said:
The uncertainty principle comes into play for observable pairs [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex] and [itex]\hat{R}[/itex] where there is no eigenstate of [itex]\hat{Q}[/itex] that is also an eigenstate of [itex]\hat{R}[/itex].

Is that non-commutation?