Different classification of subfields of Physics.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the classification of physics subfields, specifically distinguishing between classical and modern physics, as well as theoretical and experimental branches. The fields mentioned include nuclear and particle physics, atomic, molecular, and optical physics, condensed matter physics, astrophysics, and applied physics. It is noted that classifications can be arbitrary, but a general guideline is that fields relying on relativity or quantum mechanics are considered modern, while those that do not fall under classical physics. Each field typically encompasses both theoretical and experimental subdomains, with computational physics also recognized as a distinct category.
Jana163
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear members,
I'm having trouble distinguishing between classical and modern physics subfields and theoretical and experimental classification when compared to the classification listed:
1, Nuclear and particle physics
2. Atomic, molecular, and optical physics
3. Condensed matter physics
4. Astrophysics
5. Applied Physics
Which of the listed fields would be considered theoretical, experimental, classical and modern? Since not being a physicist I seem to have confusion about this.Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Such classifications are arbitrary and not often useful. But generally speaking, anything not relying on relativity or quantum mechanics can be considered classical, otherwise it is modern. Any field will have theoretical and experimental subdomains (to which I would add computational as a distinct category).
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K