1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Different representation of Laplacian

  1. Apr 3, 2010 #1


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I am trying to show that the laplacian:

    [tex]L = -\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]
    can also be represented as:
    [tex]L = \frac{1}{2}(\vec{E}^{2}-\vec{B}^{2})[/tex]

    where [tex]F^{\mu\nu} = \partial{}^{\mu}A^{\nu} - \partial{}^{\nu}A^{\mu}[/tex]
    [tex]F_{\mu\nu} = g_{\mu\alpha}F^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta\nu}[/tex]

    A is the scalar potential.

    [itex]F^{\mu\nu}[/itex] is the antisymmetric field strength tensor.

    But I cannot see how they are able to represent the first equation as the second equation.
    Any advice would really help me a lot.
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Different representation of Laplacian
  1. Complex Laplacian (Replies: 3)

  2. Representation of (Replies: 3)

  3. Complex representation (Replies: 3)