Different representation of Laplacian

  • Thread starter Oddbio
  • Start date
  • #1
Oddbio
Gold Member
46
0
I am trying to show that the laplacian:

[tex]L = -\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]
can also be represented as:
[tex]L = \frac{1}{2}(\vec{E}^{2}-\vec{B}^{2})[/tex]

where [tex]F^{\mu\nu} = \partial{}^{\mu}A^{\nu} - \partial{}^{\nu}A^{\mu}[/tex]
and
[tex]F_{\mu\nu} = g_{\mu\alpha}F^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta\nu}[/tex]

A is the scalar potential.

[itex]F^{\mu\nu}[/itex] is the antisymmetric field strength tensor.

But I cannot see how they are able to represent the first equation as the second equation.
Any advice would really help me a lot.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2021 Award
17,242
17,235
I would use the matrix representations of ##F^{\mu \nu}## and ##F_{\mu \nu}## and compute it.
 

Suggested for: Different representation of Laplacian

Replies
1
Views
388
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
149
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
242
Replies
35
Views
750
Replies
2
Views
475
Replies
1
Views
186
Replies
5
Views
202
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
377
Replies
13
Views
579
Top