I am trying to show that the laplacian:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]L = -\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

can also be represented as:

[tex]L = \frac{1}{2}(\vec{E}^{2}-\vec{B}^{2})[/tex]

where [tex]F^{\mu\nu} = \partial{}^{\mu}A^{\nu} - \partial{}^{\nu}A^{\mu}[/tex]

and

[tex]F_{\mu\nu} = g_{\mu\alpha}F^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta\nu}[/tex]

A is the scalar potential.

[itex]F^{\mu\nu}[/itex] is the antisymmetric field strength tensor.

But I cannot see how they are able to represent the first equation as the second equation.

Any advice would really help me a lot.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Different representation of Laplacian

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**