Different representations of spinors

i_hbar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
First, greetings from newbie to "staff"

Now, let's start:

Since some days I'm struggling a little bit with this paper: http://jmp.aip.org/resource/1/jmapaq/v5/i9/p1204_s1?isAuthorized=no , especially with two questions:

1) On page 1205, II, A (right column): What does [itex]\tilde v B \gamma_5[/itex] mean? The gamma 5 matrix isn't the problem, but what is the B and the tilde?? For me the "transpose-conjugate" of a (Dirac-)spinor should be more simply like [itex]v^{\dagger}\gamma_0[/itex].

2) Some lines later one finds the "basic equation". Isn't the term [itex]c_{\mu \nu} \gamma^{\mu \nu}[/itex] there equal to zero?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The searched answer(s) can be read in Ref. 10 of the paper.
-> Problem is solved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K