Hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am currently stuck on problem 5.3 (c) about spinor products in PS, where one needs to prove the Fierz identity:

$$ \bar{u}_{L}(p_{1}) \gamma^{\mu} {u}_{L}(p_{2}) [\gamma_{\mu}]_{ab} = 2 [u_{L}(p_{2})\bar{u}_{L}(p_1) +u_{R}(p_{1})\bar{u}_{R}(p_2) ]_{ab} $$

They say that a Dirac matric M satisfies:

$$ \gamma^{5} [M]=-[M]\gamma^{5}$$

hence should be of the form:

$$ [M]= \left( \frac{1-\gamma^{5}}{2} \right) \gamma_{\mu} V^{\mu} + \left( \frac{1+\gamma^{5}}{2} \right) \gamma_{\mu} W^{\mu} $$

But then, to get the answer, I suppose that:

$$ V^{\mu} = u_{L}(p_{2})\bar{u}_{L}(p_1) $$

$$ W^{\mu} = u_{R}(p_{1})\bar{u}_{R}(p_2) $$

Honestly, I don't see exactly why. Can someone point me out the way to make this identification?

Next, in part (d), we should get an amplitude of the form:

$$ i\mathcal{M} = (-ie)^{2} \bar{v}_{R} (k_{2}) \gamma^{\mu} u_{R} (k_{1}) \frac{-i}{s} \bar{u}_{R}(p_{1})\gamma_{\nu} v_{R}(p_2)$$

Thus, we have terms in u and v. However, all the spinor product formalism has been developed in terms of u. My question is: can one define a spinor product $$s(p_1,p_2)=\bar{v}_{R}(p_1) u_{L}(p_2) $$?

Thanks,

Emmanuel

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Spinor product in Peskin-Schroeder problem 5.3

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**