Different representations of SU3 and resultant multiplets

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the representations of SU(3) in the context of strongly interacting particles, specifically quarks and hadrons. It clarifies that while quarks and hadrons are not the basis vectors of irreducible representations, they do form multiplets within these representations. The conversation highlights the importance of symmetry-breaking effects that differentiate baryons in the baryon octet, which arise from the mass and charge differences among up, down, and strange quarks. The choice of representation, whether Cartan or Gell-Mann, does not alter the eigenvalues of isospin and hypercharge associated with these particles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SU(3) symmetry in particle physics
  • Familiarity with irreducible representations in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of baryon octets and their properties
  • Concept of symmetry breaking in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical framework of SU(3) representations
  • Explore the implications of symmetry breaking in particle physics
  • Learn about the Gell-Mann matrices and their applications
  • Investigate the properties of baryon multiplets and their physical significance
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, theoretical physicists, and students studying quantum mechanics and symmetry in particle interactions will benefit from this discussion.

metroplex021
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
I have a very basic query about multiplets. In the SU(3) approach strongly interacting particles, quarks and hadrons are the basis vectors of irreducible representations of SU(3). Now, quarks and hadrons are definite properties with define eigenvalues of hypercharge and isospin: to put it another way, there is only one set of quarks and hadrons. But there are many different irreducible representations of SU(3). For example, we are free to choose the Cartan representation, or the Gell-Mann representation, of the SU(3) matrices as our representation of SU(3). How do we know that these different representations will all produce particles with the same set of eigenvalues of isospin and hypercharge - ie, how do we know whatever representation we choose, we'll get back our actual quarks and the hadrons? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
quarks and hadrons are NOT the basis vectors.
 
Really? But Lichtenberg for example in 'Unitary Symmetry and Elementary Particles' (p34) writes "The basis vectors of an irreducible unitary representation of a symmetry transformation denote a set of quantum mechanical states. These states are said to constitute a multiplet." The three quarks, and the baryon octet etc, all constitute multiplets. So why is it they're not basis vectors? -- Thanks a lot.
 
If flavor SU(3) was a perfect symmetry of the world, then all of the baryons in the baryon octet would be indistinguishable. They would all have the same mass, charge, etc. But it isn't. It's broken by the mass and charge differences of the up, down and strange quarks. It's these symmetry-breaking effects that pick out which components of an SU(3) multiplet correspond to observed baryons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K