Different versions of Falkner-Skan equation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fahraynk
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on three different versions of the Falkner-Skan equations used in fluid dynamics. The first version is derived from Schlichting's "Boundary Layer Theory" (9th edition, page 169), while the second version originates from an MIT open course material (Chapter 3, Page 41). The third version is a recitation of the second, differing only in the normalization of the similarity variable. Despite the variations, the behavior of all equations remains effectively the same, akin to the different forms of the Blasius equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Falkner-Skan equations in fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with boundary layer theory
  • Knowledge of similarity variables in differential equations
  • Basic grasp of mathematical normalization techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the Falkner-Skan equations in fluid dynamics
  • Study Schlichting's "Boundary Layer Theory" for deeper insights
  • Explore the MIT open course materials on fluid dynamics
  • Investigate the Blasius equation and its variations for comparative analysis
USEFUL FOR

Fluid dynamics researchers, engineering students, and professionals involved in boundary layer analysis will benefit from this discussion.

fahraynk
Messages
185
Reaction score
5
So I have seen 3 different version of the Falkner-Skan equations and I am wondering what is the difference between them?

The first version :
$$ F'''+FF''+\beta (1-F^{'2})=0\\\\
\beta=\frac{2m}{m+1}\\\\
U_e=aX^m $$

Second version:
$$F'''+\frac{m+1}{2}FF''+m(1-F^{'2})=0\\\\
U_e=aX^m $$

Third version :
$$F'''+(m+1)FF''+m(1-F^{'2})=0\\\\
U_e=aX^m $$

If I plus the formula for beta into the first equation I get ##\frac{m+1}{2}(F'''+FF'')+m(1-F^{'2})=0##
Clearly its not the same.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have the sources where you saw the different versions?

If by plus ##\beta## you mean multiple by ##\frac{1}{\beta}## and ##\beta## is now defined as ##\beta=\frac{2}{m+1}##, that looks okay. As for the difference between the F-S equations you're seeing, I'd first look at what assumptions were made during the derivation.

It'd be my guess that you'd find the answer there, or I could be totally wrong.
 
Thanks for your reply!

So the second version came from this book from some MIT open course
https://learning-modules.mit.edu/service/materials/groups/166456/files/3079b99e-d885-4950-a04a-21486cb994ec/link?errorRedirect=/materials/index.html
Chapter 3 Page 41of the above link.

The first version came from Schlichting's Boundary Layer Theory 9ed pg 169
But also I found it in the pages I posted below. (here there is a moving ramp in opposite direction of freestream and also suction at wall)
upload_2017-8-24_4-52-46.png

upload_2017-8-24_4-52-59.png

upload_2017-8-24_4-53-10.png

upload_2017-8-24_4-53-20.png


The third version came from a recitation of that class whose book was above. The only difference is it is not divided by a 2.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-8-24_4-53-6.png
    upload_2017-8-24_4-53-6.png
    6 KB · Views: 776
The difference is the choice of similarity variable. The behavior of all of the equations is effectively the same but the variables have been normalized slightly differently. It's similar to how you can find two versions of the Blasius equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fahraynk

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
475
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K