Differentiability and extreme points question

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
16 replies · 2K views
nhrock3
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
2.b)
f is continues in [0,1] and differentiable in (0,1)
f(0)=0 and for [tex]x\in(0,1)[/tex] |f'(x)|<=|f(x)| and 0<a<1
prove:
(i)the set {|f(x)| : 0<=x<=a} has maximum
(ii)for every x\in(0,a] this innequality holds [tex]\frac{f(x)}{x}\leq max{|f(x)|:0<=x<=a}[/tex]
(iii)f(x)=0 for [tex]x\in[0,a][/tex]
(iii)f(x)=0 for [tex]x\in[0,1][/tex]
in each of the following subquestion we can use the previosly proves subquestion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i don't want solution only starting guidence.
for 1 i know the a continues function has a maximum
 
there is a difference between solution
and starting guidence
 
i only know about the function what was given
 
f is continues in [0,1] and differentiable in (0,1)
f(0)=0 and for [tex]x\in(0,1)[/tex] |f'(x)|<=|f(x)| and 0<a<1
 
nhrock3 said:
f is continues in [0,1] and differentiable in (0,1)
f(0)=0 and for [tex]x\in(0,1)[/tex] |f'(x)|<=|f(x)| and 0<a<1

Yes, that is what we are given.

But we need to prove in (1) that

[tex]\{|f(x)|~\vert~x\in [0,a]\}[/tex]

has a maximum. To show this, we must use that every continuous function on a closed interval has a maximum.
So, what will we take as our continuous function?
 
we can't take a spesific function
its a proof for all function

a proof for a spesific is not sufficient
 
nhrock3 said:
we can't take a spesific function
its a proof for all function

a proof for a spesific is not sufficient

You don't understand what micromass is trying to imply. He's not suggesting taking a specific function like f(x) = sinx. He means you need to choose the correct function in your proof, which has to do with f(x) (hint hint), in order to prove that {|f(x)| | 0<= x <= a} has a maximum.
The answer is pretty clear - you just need to formulate a short proof.
Get it?
 
ahh now i get it
we need to formulate some other functionand using it we prove about
our abstract f(x)

maybe g(X)=|f(x)|
?
 
ionly know one way
and it showing that [tex]lim_{x->x0}f(x)=f(x0)[/tex]

but its not possible
because we don't have an actual function
 
nhrock3 said:
ionly know one way
and it showing that [tex]lim_{x->x0}f(x)=f(x0)[/tex]

but its not possible
because we don't have an actual function

You don't need to show that, it's a given.
Like said above me, asking if the set {|f(x)| | a<=x<=b} has a maximum is just like asking "does the function |f(x)| (notice the absolute value!) get a maximum in the segment [a,b]?". You know there would be an easy answer if you'd say "|f(x)| is continuous on this closed segment and therefore gets a maximum". Therefore, you need to show that |f(x)| is a continuous.