Differentiable functions proof

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that if a function g is differentiable at a point c and g'(c) is not zero, then there exists a delta greater than zero such that g(x) is not equal to g(c) for all x in the neighborhood of c, excluding c itself. The initial approach involves using the definition of the derivative, which leads to the conclusion that g(x) is unequal to g(c). However, clarification is needed on how to properly establish the delta value. A suggestion is made to utilize the limit definition to find an appropriate epsilon, leading to the conclusion that the behavior of g(x) around c can be bounded. The key takeaway is that the non-zero derivative implies a local separation of g(x) from g(c) within a specified delta neighborhood.
dancergirlie
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a function g : (a, b)-->R. Assume that g is differentiable at some point c in
(a,b) and that g'(c) is not = 0. Show that there is a delta > 0 so that g(x) is unequal to g(c) for all x in V_delta(c)\{c}intersect(a,b)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, this is what I tried so far:

Since g is differentiable at c that means that

g'(c)=lim_x-->c (g(x)-g(c)/x-c)

since we are assuming that g'(c) is unequal to 0 that means that
lim_x-->c (g(x)-g(c)/x-c) is unequal to zero and thus g(x)-g(c) is unequal to zero
and therefore g(x) is unequal to g(c).

I don't really know where the delta comes in though, am I supposed to use the definition of a limit to show that there exists an epsilon greater than zero so that for |g'(c)-L|<epsilon?

Any help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dancergirlie said:

Homework Statement


Consider a function g : (a, b)-->R. Assume that g is differentiable at some point c in
(a,b) and that g'(c) is not = 0. Show that there is a delta > 0 so that g(x) is unequal to g(c) for all x in V_delta(c)\{c}intersect(a,b)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, this is what I tried so far:

Since g is differentiable at c that means that

g'(c)=lim_x-->c (g(x)-g(c)/x-c)

since we are assuming that g'(c) is unequal to 0 that means that
lim_x-->c (g(x)-g(c)/x-c) is unequal to zero and thus g(x)-g(c) is unequal to zero
and therefore g(x) is unequal to g(c).

I don't really know where the delta comes in though, am I supposed to use the definition of a limit to show that there exists an epsilon greater than zero so that for |g'(c)-L|<epsilon?

Any help would be great!

The fact that \lim_{x\to c} (g(x)-g(c))/(x-c)= g&#039;(c) is not 0 does NOT imply that (g(x)- g(c))/9x-c) is not 0! It does mean that you can take \epsilon to be |g'(c)/2|[/itex] and then, for some \delta&gt; 0 if |x-c|&lt; \delta, ||g(x)- g(c))/(x-c)- g&#039;(c)|&lt; |g&#039;(c)|/2. Write that as -|g&#039;(c)|/2&lt; (g(x)- g(c))/(x-c)- g&#039;(c)&lt; |g&#039;(c)|/2 and see where that leads.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K