Differentiable functions proof

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for a differentiable function g: (a, b) → R at a point c, where g'(c) ≠ 0, there exists a delta > 0 such that g(x) ≠ g(c) for all x in the neighborhood V_delta(c) \ {c} intersect (a, b). The proof hinges on the definition of the derivative, specifically that g'(c) = lim_{x→c} (g(x) - g(c)) / (x - c). Since g'(c) is non-zero, it implies that g(x) - g(c) cannot equal zero in a sufficiently small neighborhood around c. The discussion also emphasizes the need to apply the epsilon-delta definition of limits to establish the existence of such a delta.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differentiable functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Knowledge of the concept of derivatives and their implications
  • Ability to manipulate inequalities and limits in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in depth
  • Learn about the implications of non-zero derivatives in calculus
  • Explore examples of differentiable functions and their behavior around critical points
  • Practice proving properties of differentiable functions using limit definitions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on real analysis and the properties of differentiable functions. This discussion is also beneficial for educators seeking to clarify concepts related to limits and derivatives.

dancergirlie
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a function g : (a, b)-->R. Assume that g is differentiable at some point c in
(a,b) and that g'(c) is not = 0. Show that there is a delta > 0 so that g(x) is unequal to g(c) for all x in V_delta(c)\{c}intersect(a,b)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, this is what I tried so far:

Since g is differentiable at c that means that

g'(c)=lim_x-->c (g(x)-g(c)/x-c)

since we are assuming that g'(c) is unequal to 0 that means that
lim_x-->c (g(x)-g(c)/x-c) is unequal to zero and thus g(x)-g(c) is unequal to zero
and therefore g(x) is unequal to g(c).

I don't really know where the delta comes in though, am I supposed to use the definition of a limit to show that there exists an epsilon greater than zero so that for |g'(c)-L|<epsilon?

Any help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dancergirlie said:

Homework Statement


Consider a function g : (a, b)-->R. Assume that g is differentiable at some point c in
(a,b) and that g'(c) is not = 0. Show that there is a delta > 0 so that g(x) is unequal to g(c) for all x in V_delta(c)\{c}intersect(a,b)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, this is what I tried so far:

Since g is differentiable at c that means that

g'(c)=lim_x-->c (g(x)-g(c)/x-c)

since we are assuming that g'(c) is unequal to 0 that means that
lim_x-->c (g(x)-g(c)/x-c) is unequal to zero and thus g(x)-g(c) is unequal to zero
and therefore g(x) is unequal to g(c).

I don't really know where the delta comes in though, am I supposed to use the definition of a limit to show that there exists an epsilon greater than zero so that for |g'(c)-L|<epsilon?

Any help would be great!

The fact that \lim_{x\to c} (g(x)-g(c))/(x-c)= g&#039;(c) is not 0 does NOT imply that (g(x)- g(c))/9x-c) is not 0! It does mean that you can take \epsilon to be |g'(c)/2|[/itex] and then, for some \delta&gt; 0 if |x-c|&lt; \delta, ||g(x)- g(c))/(x-c)- g&#039;(c)|&lt; |g&#039;(c)|/2. Write that as -|g&#039;(c)|/2&lt; (g(x)- g(c))/(x-c)- g&#039;(c)&lt; |g&#039;(c)|/2 and see where that leads.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K