Differential equation with a matrix

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation $\frac{d\mathbf{X}}{dt} = \mathbf{NX}$, where $\mathbf{N}$ is a given matrix. Participants explore the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the matrix, the implications for the solution, and the correctness of proposed solutions. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and technical explanations related to differential equations and linear algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the matrix $\mathbf{N}$ and proposes a solution involving eigenvalues and eigenvectors, but questions the correctness of their approach.
  • Another participant challenges the identification of an eigenvector for the eigenvalue $\lambda_2 = 5$, suggesting an alternative vector.
  • A later reply discusses the nature of the solution $(1, 2)^t$, asserting that it can be considered a solution to the differential equation under specific conditions.
  • Further elaboration on the differential equation is provided, breaking it down into two separate equations and deriving a second-order differential equation from the first.
  • The characteristic equation derived from the second-order differential equation is presented, leading to a general solution expressed in terms of constants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the identification of eigenvectors and the correctness of proposed solutions. There is no consensus on the validity of the initial solution, and multiple interpretations of the solution exist.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the eigenvalues and eigenvectors may be missing or unclear. The discussion involves unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on definitions related to the solutions of the differential equations.

Rorschach
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have the matrix $ \mathbf{N} = \begin{bmatrix} 4 & -2 \\ -2 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$ and $\mathbf{X} = \begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \end{bmatrix}$. I want to solve $\displaystyle \frac{d\mathbf{X}}{dt} = \mathbf{NX}$.

The eigenvalues of the matrix are $\lambda_1, \lambda_2 = 0,5$ and eigenvectors are $v_1 = (1,2)^t$ and $v_2 = (2, 1)^t$.

So I thought the solution would be $\mathbf{X} = c_1 (1,2)^t + c_2(2,1)^{t}e^{5t}$. But apparently this is wrong? Why?

P.S. the t on the vectors denotes transpose, not to be confused with the t on the exponential.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
$v_2$ is not an eigenvector for the eigenvalue $\lambda_2 = 5$. Try it with $(-2, 1)^t$.
The rest seems fine to me.
 
Krylov said:
$v_2$ is not an eigenvector for the eigenvalue $\lambda_2 = 5$. Try it with $(-2, 1)^t$.
The rest seems fine to me.
Thank you. Is it technically correct to say that $(1, 2)^t$ is a solution to the differential equation? This question was a multiple choice, and the only answer that fits is $(1,2)^t$. I think this is the correct answer because $c_1 (1,2)^t+c_2(-2,1)^te^{5t} = (1,2)^t$ for $c_1 = 1, c_2 = 0$.
 
Last edited:
Rorschach said:
Thank you. Is it technically correct to say that $(1, 2)^t$ is a solution to the differential equation? This question was a multiple choice, and the only answer that fits is $(1,2)^t$. I think this is the correct answer because $c_1 (1,2)^t+c_2(-2,1)^te^{5t} = (1,2)^t$ for $c_1 = 1, c_2 = 0$.

The whole line $\{c_1 (1,2)^t \,:\, c_1 \in \mathbb{R}\}$ consists of constant solutions of the differential equation, and choosing $c_1 = 1$ selects one of them, so you are right indeed.
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much!
 
A less "sophisticated" version: The differential equation $\frac{dX}{dt}= NX$, with $N= \begin{bmatrix}4 & -2 \\ -2 & 1\end{bmatrix}$ can be written, by taking $X= \begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \end{bmatrix}$ as $\begin{bmatrix}\frac{dx}{dt} \\ \frac{dy}{dt} \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}4x- 2y \\ -2x+ y\end{bmatrix}$.

That is equivalent to the two differential equations
$\frac{dx}{dt}= 4x- 2y$ and $\frac{dy}{dt}= -2x+ y$.

Differentiate the first equation again to get $\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}= 4\frac{dx}{dt}- 2\frac{dy}{dt}$. Using the second equation, we can replace that $\frac{dy}{dt}$ by $-2x+ y$ to get
$\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}= 4\frac{dx}{dt}- 2(-2x+ y)= 4\frac{dx}{dt}+ 4x- 2y$

But from the first equation $-2y= \frac{dx}{dt}- 4x$ so that becomes
$\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}= 4\frac{dx}{dt}+ 4x+ \frac{dx}{dt}- 4x= 5\frac{dx}{dt}$

The characteristic equation for the differential equation $\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}+ 5\frac{dx}{dt}= 0$ is $r^2+ 5r= r(r+ 5)= 0$ which gives r= 0 and r= -5. The general solution is $x(t)= A+ Be^{-5t}$. From the equation $-2y= \frac{dx}{dt}- 4x$, $-2y= -5Be^{-5t}- 4A- 4Be^{-5t}= -4A- 9Be^{-5t}$.

So $X(t)= \begin{bmatrix}A+ Be^{-5t} \\ -4A- 9Be^{-5t} \end{bmatrix}= A\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ -4 \end{bmatrix}+ Be^{-5t}\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ -9 \end{bmatrix}$.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K