Differential equations question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation problem involving a rock falling through water, where the acceleration is modeled as a function of velocity. The original poster seeks to prove that the acceleration depends exponentially on time, given specific initial conditions and a defined relationship between acceleration and velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods to derive the relationship between acceleration and time, questioning the correctness of their approaches and the presence of constants in the exponential form. There is also discussion about the integration of velocity and the implications of treating it as a variable function.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing alternative methods and questioning assumptions made in the original attempts. Some guidance has been offered regarding the integration process and the nature of the variables involved, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the initial conditions of the problem and the requirement to derive the acceleration function from the differential equation. There is an emphasis on the need to understand the functional form of velocity before proceeding with integration.

Spoti112
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
I saw this problem and solved it but still I had one question...

Homework Statement


A rock falls through water with a continuously decreasing acceleration. Assume that the rock’s acceleration as a function of velocity has the form ay = g - bvy where b is a positive constant. (The +y direction is directly downward.) Prove mathematically that if the rock is released from rest at time t=0, the acceleration will depend exponentially on time according to ay(t) = g*e-2bt.

ay = g - bVy , b>0 , b=const
t=0 → V0=0 m/s

Homework Equations


dVy/dt = ay
Vy = ∫aydt

The Attempt at a Solution


ay = g - bVy
dVy/dt = g - bVy
dVy / (g - bVy) = dt ⇒ t = -(1/b)*ln(g - bVy) + c
0=-(1/b)*ln(g - bVy) + c ⇒ c = (ln(g)) / b
⇒ bt = ln(g) - ln(ay) ⇒ ay(t) = g*e-2bt

BUT... when i do it this way it doesn't i get this: (this was my first try)
Vy = ∫aydt = gt - bVyt + c
t=0 → V0=0 ⇒ c=0
Vy = gt - bVyt ⇒ Vy * (1+bt) = gt
ay = dVy/dt = (d/dt) * ( gt/(1+bt) ) = g/(bt+1)2 → ?

is this second answer correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spoti112 said:
I saw this problem and solved it but still I had one question...

Homework Statement


A rock falls through water with a continuously decreasing acceleration. Assume that the rock’s acceleration as a function of velocity has the form ay = g - bvy where b is a positive constant. (The +y direction is directly downward.) Prove mathematically that if the rock is released from rest at time t=0, the acceleration will depend exponentially on time according to ay(t) = g*e-2bt.

ay = g - bVy , b>0 , b=const
t=0 → V0=0 m/s

Homework Equations


dVy/dt = ay
Vy = ∫aydt

The Attempt at a Solution


ay = g - bVy
dVy/dt = g - bVy
dVy / (g - bVy) = dt ⇒ t = -(1/b)*ln(g - bVy) + c
0=-(1/b)*ln(g - bVy) + c ⇒ c = (ln(g)) / b
⇒ bt = ln(g) - ln(ay) ⇒ ay(t) = g*e-2bt

BUT... when i do it this way it doesn't i get this: (this was my first try)
Vy = ∫aydt = gt - bVyt + c
t=0 → V0=0 ⇒ c=0
Vy = gt - bVyt ⇒ Vy * (1+bt) = gt
ay = dVy/dt = (d/dt) * ( gt/(1+bt) ) = g/(bt+1)2 → ?

is this second answer correct?
Where does the 2 come from in the exponential in your first answer? I believe there should not be any 2 there. ## \\ ## For this problem, I like to write the equation ## \frac{dv}{dt}=g-bv ## as a differential equation ## \frac{dv}{dt}+bv=g ## and then find the homogeneous solution, along with the particular solution for ## v ##. Taking ## a=\frac{dv}{dt} ## gives the final result. I got the same answer in that manner, but again, without a 2 in the exponential. ## \\ ## For your second method, you don't know what the function ## v=v(t) ## looks like, so you can't integrate ## \int bv \, dt ##. The result you give for the integral is incorrect, and really undetermined, until you know what ## v=v(t) ## is.
 
Last edited:
sorry there is no 2. I have made a mistake when i was writing this post... and i copied it everywhere...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
Charles Link said:
For your second method, you don't know what the function v=v(t)v=v(t) v=v(t) looks like, so you can't integrate ∫bvdt∫bvdt \int bv \, dt . The result you give for the integral is incorrect, and really undetermined, until you know what v=v(t)v=v(t) v=v(t) is.
don`t i know the function from the V(t=0)=0 and the differential equation that i get from the integral Vy = ∫aydt (here i integrate a known function) ?
i mean aren't these two thing enough?
 
Spoti112 said:
don`t i know the function from the V(t=0)=0 and the differential equation that i get from the integral Vy = ∫aydt (here i integrate a known function) ?
i mean aren't these two thing enough?
The statement ## v=\int\limits_{0}^{t} a \, dt +v_o ## is correct, but when you put in the form ## a=g-bv ## , you are now working with ## v=v(t) ## in the integral. ## v ## is not a constant in this integrand, and you do not know its functional form ## v=v(t) ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Spoti112
GOT it! thank you very much!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K