Differential Equations. Reduction of Order. Calc IV.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the second-order differential equation (x² + 2y')y'' + 2xy' = 0 with initial conditions y(0) = 1 and y'(0) = 0. The method of reduction of order is employed, leading to the substitution y' = p and y'' = p'. The solution process reveals that the equation simplifies to y'^2 + x²y' = 0, resulting in two potential solutions: y' = 0 or y' = -x². The final solution is determined to be y = -x³/3 + 1 after applying the initial conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order differential equations
  • Familiarity with the method of reduction of order
  • Knowledge of initial value problems
  • Basic integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of reduction of order in greater detail
  • Learn about non-linear differential equations and their solutions
  • Explore the implications of initial conditions in differential equations
  • Practice solving various second-order differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on differential equations, as well as mathematicians and engineers dealing with initial value problems.

Gummy Bear
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(x2+2y')y''+2xy'=0 with initial conditions of y(0)=1 and y'(0)=0

Homework Equations



reduction of order, and exact equations..

The Attempt at a Solution



let y'=p and y''=p'
Giving: (x2+2p)p'+2xp Let M=2xp and N=(x2+2p)
So, Mp=2x and Nx=2x Therefore, they are exact.
Let fx=2xp
so, f(x,p)=x2p+h(p)
fp=x2=h'(p)
comparing to fp=x2+2p we know h'(p)=2p so, h(p)=p2
so, c=p2+px2
Now, solve for p: using quadratic.
p=(-x2±√(x4+4c))/2
Substitute back for y'=p
y'=(1/2)(-x2±√(x4+4c)
y=?

This is where I'm not sure what to do.

I'm pretty sure I use the initial conditions, do I assume c=0 and take the integral of:
(1/2)(-x2±√(x4))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gummy Bear said:

Homework Statement



(x2+2y')y''+2xy'=0 with initial conditions of y(0)=1 and y'(0)=0

Homework Equations



reduction of order, and exact equations..

The Attempt at a Solution



let y'=p and y''=p'
Giving: (x2+2p)p'+2xp Let M=2xp and N=(x2+2p)
So, Mp=2x and Nx=2x Therefore, they are exact.
Let fx=2xp
so, f(x,p)=x2p+h(p)
fp=x2=h'(p)
comparing to fp=x2+2p we know h'(p)=2p so, h(p)=p2
so, c=p2+px2

Right there you have ##y'^2+x^2y'=c##. If you use ##y'(0)=0## you get ##c=0## so your equation is ##y'^2+x^2y'=y'(y'+x^2)=0##. This tells you that either ##y'=0## or ##y'=-x^2##, both of which are easy to handle.
 
I'm confused, you're substituting back for p before solving for p? Also, y'(0)≠0 y'(0)=1.

Does that mean my equation should be:
y'2+x2y'=1

And from there solve for y?
 
Gummy Bear said:

Homework Statement



(x2+2y')y''+2xy'=0 with initial conditions of y(0)=1 and y'(0)=0

LCKurtz said:
Right there you have ##y'^2+x^2y'=c##. If you use ##y'(0)=0## you get ##c=0## so your equation is ##y'^2+x^2y'=y'(y'+x^2)=0##. This tells you that either ##y'=0## or ##y'=-x^2##, both of which are easy to handle.

Gummy Bear said:
I'm confused, you're substituting back for p before solving for p? Also, y'(0)≠0 y'(0)=1.
I have quoted your original boundary condition. ##p=y'## so I just put it in. It doesn't matter which you call it, but using ##y'## emphasizes that is what it is, and it makes it more natural when using the boundary conditions.

Does that mean my equation should be:
y'2+x2y'=1

No. You get 0 on the right side. It means either ##y'=0## or ##y'=-x^2##. Solve those, apply any boundary conditions and, if you aren't sure, check the solutions work.
 
Wow. I got it mixed up with the problem out of the book. It's been a long day. You're right..

So all I have to do is:

y=∫0dx=c

y=∫(-x2)dx=(-x3)/3+c

Therefore, y=∫(-x2)dx=(-x3)/3+c is the answer?

Thanks for helping me by the way.
 
Gummy Bear said:
Wow. I got it mixed up with the problem out of the book. It's been a long day. You're right..

So all I have to do is:

y=∫0dx=c

y=∫(-x2)dx=(-x3)/3+c

Therefore, y=∫(-x2)dx=(-x3)/3+c is the answer?

Thanks for helping me by the way.

Use the boundary condition to evaluate c. A second order equation with two initial conditions won't have any arbitrary constants left. And you shouldn't use the same c for both constants.
 
I should add here that this is a non-linear equation. You get two separate solutions. Nothing says that the sum of those two solutions is also a solution.
 
Oh, so now I say because y(0)=1 0/3+c2=1 so, c2=1?

Therefore, y=-x3/3+1

What do you mean don't use the same constant? Are you referring to y=∫0dx=c1?

What do I do with the y=∫0dx=c1 anyway?
 
Gummy Bear said:
Oh, so now I say because y(0)=1 0/3+c2=1 so, c2=1?

Therefore, y=-x3/3+1

What do you mean don't use the same constant? Are you referring to y=∫0dx=c1?

What do I do with the y=∫0dx=c1 anyway?

You apply the boundary condition ##y(0)=1##. Remember you used ##y'(0)=0## to get the two separate solutions. Each of them satisfies ##y(0)=1##. So you have two different solutions to this problem. You should check that they both work.
 
  • #10
Ya, I figured that out after asking. But how do I check that both -x3/3+1 and 1 work?
 
  • #11
Gummy Bear said:
Ya, I figured that out after asking. But how do I check that both -x3/3+1 and 1 work?

Plug them into the equation and boundary conditions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K