Differentiate a function using the quotient rule

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on differentiating the function y = (v^3 - 2v√v)/v using the quotient rule. Participants emphasize the importance of rewriting square roots as exponents for easier differentiation, specifically noting that √v equals v^(1/2). There is debate over whether the quotient rule is necessary, with some suggesting simplification before differentiation could be more straightforward. Ultimately, the consensus is to use the quotient rule as required by the textbook, leading to the derivative expression 2v - 1/√v. The conversation highlights the balance between following prescribed methods and finding simpler alternatives in calculus.
frosty8688
Messages
126
Reaction score
0
1. Differentiate
2. y = \frac{v^{3} - 2v\sqrt{v}}{v}
3. I am trying to use the quotient rule, but am having trouble understanding how to use the square root. Here's what I have \frac{v(3v^{2}-2*1/2\sqrt{v}) - v^{3}+2v*1/2\sqrt{v}}{v^{2}}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that the square root of a number is equivalent to that number to the one-half power. So, \sqrt {x} = x^{\frac {1} {2}} Replace the square roots with exponents, simplify the numerator and then use the power rule.
 
frosty8688 said:
2. y = \frac{v^{3} - 2v\sqrt{v}}{v}
\sqrt{v} = v^{1/2}, so
2v\sqrt{v} = 2v\;v^{1/2} = ?EDIT: Beaten to it. :wink:
 
I did, that's how I got \sqrt{v} to equal \frac{1}{2\sqrt{v}}. I am just having problems figuring out how to multiply it out.
 
It equals v*v^{-1/2}
 
frosty8688 said:
2. y = \frac{v^{3} - 2v\sqrt{v}}{v}

Before you start differentiating, rewrite the expression without square roots:
y = \frac{v^3 - 2v\;v^{1/2}}{v}
So what is
2v\;v^{1/2}?
 
Is there a reason you are using the quotient rule?
 
eumyang said:
2v\sqrt{v} = 2v\;v^{1/2} = ?

frosty8688 said:
It equals v*v^{-1/2}

If you were answering me, then I'm afraid you're wrong. Use the properties of exponents.
 
Robert1986 said:
Is there a reason you are using the quotient rule?

I was wondering the same thing, but I assumed that this is a problem from a textbook and the directions required the use of the quotient rule.
 
  • #10
eumyang said:
I was wondering the same thing, but I assumed that this is a problem from a textbook and the directions required the use of the quotient rule.

That's what I was leaning toward - but I just want to be sure.
 
  • #11
It would be 2*\frac{3}{2}v^{1/2} which would equal 3v^{1/2}
 
  • #12
frosty8688 said:
It would be 2*\frac{3}{2}v^{1/2} which would equal 3v^{1/2}

Well, that's the derivative of 2v^{3/2}, but I was expecting you to say 2v^{3/2} first, before taking the derivative. So now the original expression becomes
y = \frac{v^3 - 2v^{3/2}}{v}
Use the quotient rule from here.
 
  • #13
I see. Thanks for helping.
 
  • #14
I don't believe you calculated the derivative of the numerator correctly

v^{3} - 2v \sqrt {v}
v^{3} - 2v v^{\frac {1} {2}}
v^{3} - 2v^{\frac {3} {2}}
Using the sum rule, differentiate both to get
3v^{2} - 3 \sqrt {v}

Use the quotient rule as you normally did, see if it's easier to simplify.

EDIT: You beat me to it this time, you got your revenge.
 
  • #15
Can't you just simplify the equation and differentiate that?
 
  • #16
Mark M said:
I don't believe you calculated the derivative of the numerator correctly

v^{3} - 2v \sqrt {v}
v^{3} - 2v v^{\frac {1} {2}}
v^{3} - 2v^{\frac {3} {2}}
Using the sum rule, differentiate both to get
3v^{2} - 3 \sqrt {v}

Use the quotient rule as you normally did, see if it's easier to simplify.

EDIT: You beat me to it this time, you got your revenge.

On another forum (that also provided help in math), I recall that you could see who was viewing a particular thread. I remember that I would not bother replying to a thread if I saw that someone else was viewing the same thread.

frosty8688 said:
Can't you just simplify the equation and differentiate that?

What do you mean? Are you now saying that we don't have to use the quotient rule? :confused:
 
  • #17
I'm just saying that wouldn't it be simpler to divide the numerator by v and differentiating the equation after that. But in the book it expects us to use the quotient rule.
 
  • #18
frosty8688 said:
I'm just saying that wouldn't it be simpler to divide the numerator by v and differentiating the equation after that. But in the book it expects us to use the quotient rule.
Of course it would be simpler. I guess you haven't read all of the posts in this thread:

Robert1986 said:
Is there a reason you are using the quotient rule?

eumyang said:
I was wondering the same thing, but I assumed that this is a problem from a textbook and the directions required the use of the quotient rule.

Robert1986 said:
That's what I was leaning toward - but I just want to be sure.
 
  • #19
Here's what I got using the quotient rule \frac{2v^{3}-v^{3/2}}{v^{2}} which equals 2v -\frac{1}{\sqrt{v}}
 
  • #20
frosty8688 said:
Here's what I got using the quotient rule \frac{2v^{3}-v^{3/2}}{v^{2}} which equals 2v -\frac{1}{\sqrt{v}}

Correct.

BTW, there's nothing wrong with putting an entire expression inside the tex tags. So instead of writing
2v -\frac{1}{\sqrt{v}}
you could write
2v - \frac{1}{\sqrt{v}}
Looks better, doesn't it? :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K