Differentiating f(-x): Proving Correctness

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiating
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of the function f(-x) given that the derivative of f(x) is g(x). Participants explore the correctness of the expression \(\frac{d}{dx}f(-x)=-g(-x)\) and seek methods to prove it, including the use of the chain rule and the definition of the derivative.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if \(\frac{d}{dx}f(x)=g(x)\), then \(\frac{d}{dx}f(-x)=-g(-x)\) and asks for a proof.
  • Another participant suggests that this is a straightforward application of the chain rule.
  • A different participant requests specifics about the chain rule in this context.
  • A participant provides the chain rule formula and identifies g(x) as -x for this case.
  • Another participant offers a direct proof using the definition of the derivative, suggesting a more general approach that can be applied to any nonzero real number c, ultimately showing that the case follows by setting c = -1.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for proving the statement, as multiple approaches are discussed, including the chain rule and the definition of the derivative.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the applicability of the chain rule and the definition of the derivative, but these assumptions are not fully explored or resolved.

tade
Messages
720
Reaction score
26
I came across this simple expression while doing some maths.

If [tex]\frac{d}{dx}f(x)=g(x)[/tex]

Then [tex]\frac{d}{dx}f(-x)=-g(-x)[/tex]



Is this correct? How do we prove it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the chain rule? This is a simple example of it.
 
phyzguy said:
Do you know the chain rule? This is a simple example of it.

What are the specifics?

:blushing:
 
Chain rule: [itex]\frac{d[f(g(x))]}{dx} = \frac{d[f(g(x))]}{d[g(x)]} \frac{d[g(x)]}{dx}[/itex]. In your case, g(x) = -x.
 
If you prefer a direct proof without using the chain rule, use the definition of the derivative. We can prove something slightly more general. If
$$g(x) = \frac{d}{dx}f(x) = \lim_{h \to 0}\frac{f(x+h) - f(x)}{h}$$
and ##a(x) = f(cx)## where ##c## is any nonzero real number,
$$\begin{align}
\frac{d}{dx} a(x) &= \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{a(x+h) - a(x)}{h} \\
&= \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(c(x+h)) - f(cx)}{h} \\
\end{align}$$
Letting ##k = ch##, we note that ##h \to 0## if and only if ##k \to 0##, so the above is equivalent to
$$\begin{align}
\frac{d}{dx} a(x) &= \lim_{k \to 0} \frac{f(cx + k) - f(cx)}{k/c} \\
&= c \lim_{k \to 0} \frac{f(cx + k) - f(cx)}{k} \\
&= c g(cx) \\
\end{align}$$
Your case follows by setting ##c = -1##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K