Differentiating vector dot product

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of the vector dot product, specifically focusing on the expression for the derivative of the magnitude of a velocity vector. Participants explore the mathematical implications of differentiating the dot product and the magnitude of the vector, raising questions about the conditions under which certain expressions are equivalent.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant differentiates the expression \( v \cdot v \) and arrives at \( 2v \frac{dv}{dt} \), questioning the equivalence with \( v^2 \).
  • Another participant challenges the assertion that the two expressions are not the same, referencing the definition of \( v \) as the magnitude of the velocity vector.
  • A mathematical derivation is presented showing that \( \frac{dv}{dt} \) can be expressed in terms of \( \vec v \) and \( \frac{d\vec v}{dt} \), suggesting that the two expressions are indeed equivalent.
  • Concerns are raised about the conditions under which \( v \frac{dv}{dt} \) equals zero, noting that this requires either \( v \) or \( \frac{dv}{dt} \) to be zero, while \( v \cdot \frac{dv}{dt} \) could be zero if the two vectors are orthogonal.
  • A geometric interpretation is provided, stating that an acceleration orthogonal to the velocity does not change the speed, implying that \( \frac{dv}{dt} \) could be zero under such conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the equivalence of the expressions derived from differentiating the dot product and the magnitude of the vector. While some argue that they are the same, others highlight specific conditions under which they may not be equivalent, leading to an unresolved debate.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the relationships between the vectors involved and the conditions under which certain mathematical identities hold. There are also references to geometric interpretations that may not be universally accepted.

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Hi.
If I have a vector v , say for velocity for example then v.v = v2 and I differentiate wrt t v.v I get 2v.dv/dt but if I differentiate v2 I get 2v dv/dt but v.dv.dt is not the same as v dv/dt so what am I doing wrong ?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you say they are not the same? Remember that ##v =\left( v_x^2+v_y^2+v_z^2 \right )^{1/2}##.
 
Last edited:
##\frac{dv}{dt}= \frac{d}{dt} \sqrt{\vec v \vec v} = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\vec v \vec v}} \left(\vec v \frac{d\vec v}{dt} + \frac{d\vec v}{dt} v\right) = \frac{1}{v} \vec v \frac{d \vec v}{dt}##.
The two expressions are the same.
 
kuruman said:
Why do you say they are not the same? Remember that ##v =\left( v_x^2+v_y^2+v_z^2 \right )^{1/2}##.
Because for vdv/dt to be zero needs v or dv/dt to be zero but v.dv/dt could be zero if v and dv/dt are orthogonal
 
dyn said:
Because for vdv/dt to be zero needs v or dv/dt to be zero but v.dv/dt could be zero if v and dv/dt are orthogonal
To paraphrase @mfb,
$$v\frac{dv}{dt} =\left( v_x^2+v_y^2+v_z^2 \right )^{1/2} \frac{d}{dt}\left( v_x^2+v_y^2+v_z^2 \right )^{1/2} \\=
\frac{1}{2} \frac{\left( v_x^2+v_y^2+v_z^2 \right )^{1/2}}{\left( v_x^2+v_y^2+v_z^2 \right )^{1/2}}\left(2v_x\frac{dv_x}{dt} +2v_y\frac{dv_y}{dt}+2v_z\frac{dv_z}{dt} \right) =\left(v_x\frac{dv_x}{dt} +v_y\frac{dv_y}{dt}+v_z\frac{dv_z}{dt} \right)\\=\vec v \cdot \frac{d \vec v}{dt}$$.
They are the same. Furthermore, the above proof shows that, contrary to your assertion, ##v\frac{dv}{dt} =0## when ##\vec v## and ##\frac{d\vec v}{dt}## are orthogonal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dyn
If ##\vec v## and ##\frac{d \vec v}{dt}## are orthogonal, then ##\frac{dv}{dt} = 0##. This can be derived from what I posted, but it can also be understood geometrically: An acceleration orthogonal to the velocity does not change the speed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dyn
Thanks everyone. Much appreciated
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K