Is -1/2z the correct result for differentiating ln(3y-2z) with respect to z?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cabellos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The correct result for differentiating ln(3y-2z) with respect to z is -2/(3y-2z). The discussion confirms that applying the chain rule is essential for this differentiation. The user initially proposed -1/2z, which was incorrect. The final conclusion is that the differentiation process yields -2/(3y-2z) as the accurate derivative.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the chain rule in calculus
  • Familiarity with natural logarithmic functions
  • Basic differentiation techniques
  • Knowledge of variable dependencies in multivariable functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in calculus
  • Review differentiation of logarithmic functions
  • Practice problems involving multivariable calculus
  • Explore resources on implicit differentiation techniques
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, educators teaching differentiation techniques, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of logarithmic derivatives.

cabellos
Messages
76
Reaction score
1
I should know this, but i just wanted to check...differentiating ln(3y-2z) with respect to z...does this = -1/2z ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must differentiate the whole thing first, then differentiate what is on the inside.

To check your answer take the integral of -1/2z, you will see it is not equal ln(3y-2z)
 
As KoGs suggested, an appropriate use of the chain rule should do just fine.
 
ok so is it -2/3y + z
 
cabellos said:
ok so is it -2/3y + z

No, it is not. As mentioned before, try to apply the chain rule:http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ChainRule.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I did apply it...this is how i calculated that result:

d/dz In(3y-2z)
y=In u therefore dy/du = 1/u
u=3y-2z therefore du/dz = -2
dy/du x du/dz = -2/(3y-2z)

where am i going wrong?
 
cabellos said:
I did apply it...this is how i calculated that result:

d/dz In(3y-2z)
y=In u therefore dy/du = 1/u
u=3y-2z therefore du/dz = -2
dy/du x du/dz = -2/(3y-2z)

where am i going wrong?

Now you're not going wrong, since the result is correct. Good work! :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K