I Differentiation formula: Is this a typo?

maistral
Messages
235
Reaction score
17
TL;DR Summary
Resource found in the 'net, trying to know if this is a typo or not.
Red arrows.
1628420347688.png


The notes initially say that the error term is positive. After substitution of A and C which are clearly positive, the term suddenly became negative...? Is this a typo, or is there a theory behind this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems OK observing that the third term of (5.14) is f”(x).
 
Last edited:
anuttarasammyak said:
It seems OK observing that the third term of (5.14) is f”(x).
What does this imply? That either positive or negative will work?
 
maistral said:
Summary:: Resource found in the 'net, trying to know if this is a typo or not.

Red arrows.
View attachment 287254

The notes initially say that the error term is positive. After substitution of A and C which are clearly positive, the term suddenly became negative...? Is this a typo, or is there a theory behind this?
It would seem to be the formula for an estimate of the error term in the Taylor series. Is this what your question was?
 
forlmula(5.14).jpg


Transfer the second term of RHS to LHS.
 
Last edited:
I finally got it! The notation was so confusing, sorry.

1628619319082.png


1628619341009.png
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak and WWGD
Back
Top