Symbol used in total differential and small errors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the correct usage of symbols in total differentials and small errors in calculus. The accurate formula for total differential is expressed as dz = ∂f/∂x * dx + ∂f/∂y * dy, while the approximation for small errors is deltaf = ∂f/∂x * deltax + ∂f/∂y * deltay. It is emphasized that the notation df is essential for approximating changes in function values, as opposed to using ∂f alone, which lacks meaning in this context. The distinction between actual changes (Δf) and approximations is crucial for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of total differentials in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and their notation
  • Knowledge of error approximation techniques in calculus
  • Basic concepts of functions of multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of total differentials in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the significance of the notation df in calculus
  • Explore error analysis techniques in numerical methods
  • Investigate the implications of using partial derivatives in real-world applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, and physics who are working with multivariable calculus and need to understand the nuances of differentials and error approximations.

goggles31
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Mod note: Thread title changed from "Sign used in total differential and small errors" to "Symbol used in total differential and small errors"
My notes say that z=f(x,y) can be defined as the sum of the changes with respect to x,y respectively. The formula is:

dz = ∂f/∂x * dz + ∂f/∂y * dy

Whereas in small errors, the formula is:

deltaf = ∂f/∂x * deltax + ∂f/∂y * deltay

Shouldn't the sign used be ∂f since it is taken with respect to more than one variable?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
goggles31 said:
My notes say that z=f(x,y) can be defined as the sum of the changes with respect to x,y respectively. The formula is:

dz = ∂f/∂x * dz + ∂f/∂y * dy
Both the text of your notes and the formula above are incorrect. "z = f(x, y)" is not defined as a sum. The differential of z, dz, is defined as a sum. The formula you wrote has a typo, and should be dz = ∂f/∂x * dx + ∂f/∂y * dy or df = ∂f/∂x * dx + ∂f/∂y * dy.
goggles31 said:
Whereas in small errors, the formula is:

deltaf = ∂f/∂x * deltax + ∂f/∂y * deltay

Shouldn't the sign used be ∂f since it is taken with respect to more than one variable?
No. The actual change in f is ##\Delta f##, which is only approximately equal to ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \Delta x + \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \Delta y##.

∂f by itself has no meaning here, but df does. In the calculation of error, you use df to approximate the actual change in function value, ##\Delta f##.

If you know ##\Delta x## and ##\Delta y##, then ##\Delta z \approx dz = \frac{\partial z}{\partial x} \Delta x + \frac{\partial z}{\partial y} \Delta y##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alpharup
goggles31 said:
Mod note: Thread title changed from "Sign used in total differential and small errors" to "Symbol used in total differential and small errors"
My notes say that z=f(x,y) can be defined as the sum of the changes with respect to x,y respectively.
Surely you meant to say that dz, not z, can be defined that way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K