- #1

bubblewrap

- 134

- 2

**Edited by moderator**

In the attached file it says that the formula for when n=2 implies the next one but I don't understand why it suddenly became (s-t0)^2 inside the integral instead of (s-t0) in the next one and keeps this pattern, it doesn't seem to be implied anywhere for me.

Last edited by a moderator: