Difficult Planetary motion problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the length of a day on Planet X, which rotates similarly to Earth. The astronaut's weight varies at different locations on Planet X, prompting questions about the relationship between weight, gravitational force, and centripetal force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the difference in weight at the north pole and equator to centripetal force, questioning whether their approach is valid and if a calculation error occurred.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's reasoning, providing feedback on potential errors in the formulation of the equations and unit consistency. There is no explicit consensus yet, but constructive guidance has been offered regarding the mathematical setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of varying gravitational forces and the assumptions made regarding the relationship between weight and centripetal force. The original poster's calculations and assumptions are under scrutiny, particularly regarding the units used in their equations.

Hockeystar
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Planet X rotates in the same manner as the earth, around an axis through its north and south poles, and is perfectly spherical. An astronaut who weighs 950.0 N on the Earth weighs 917.0 N at the north pole of Planet X and only 860.0 N at its equator. The distance from the north pole to the equator is 1.883×104 km , measured along the surface of Planet X. How long is the day on Planet X?



Homework Equations



A lot

The Attempt at a Solution



First we solve the radius of Planet:

circumfrence = 0.5pi(r)
r=11987550m

Next we solve m: 950N/9.8 m/s2 = 96.9kg

Then the tricky tricky part. Should I assume the loss of weight is equal to the centripetal force? In that case I have

mgnorth pole - mgequator = m4pi2r2/T2
T= 9.82e7s

However my answer is incorrect. Is my theory sound? Did I make a calculation error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It all looks good except I think you have an extra r in m4pi²r²/T², which makes a large difference in the answer.
 
Hockeystar said:
mgnorth pole - mgequator = m4pi2r2/T2
Look at your units. The left hand side has units of mass*acceleration or mass*length/time2. The units on the right hand side are mass*length2/time2. Once you get into the habit of checking units, it takes but a few seconds to double check that you have consistent units. When you don't have consistent units, as is the case here, you *know* you have made an error somewhere.
 
Thanks for the help guys :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K