quicksilver123
- 173
- 0
The discussion focuses on the difficulties encountered with the Substitution Rule in integration, particularly in relation to the Chain Rule and Leibniz Rule. Users clarify that the correct application of the Substitution Rule involves recognizing that the integral of a product does not allow for factor-wise multiplication as suggested. The correct method is demonstrated using Leibniz notation, where the substitution of variables leads to the integral transformation: ∫[f(g(x))g'(x)dx] = ∫[f(u)du]. This highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between differentiation and integration rules.
Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of integration techniques, particularly the Substitution Rule and its connection to differentiation principles.
Sorry, I confused the chain rule and the Leibniz rule. The chain rule corresponds to the substitution rule and the Leibniz rule corresponds to integration by parts. The shortest way to see the equation in (4) is to use the notation with the ##d##'s, also called Leibniz notation. Here we get by the substitution ##g(x)=u##quicksilver123 said:Could you explicitly explain the correct method in terms of your liebnitz Rule?