Diffraction Grating, Maxima, finding slit seperation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a diffraction grating problem involving light of a specific wavelength and the conditions for maxima at given angles. The original poster seeks to determine the smallest slit width for the grating based on the provided information about adjacent maxima and missing higher-order maxima.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between slit width and angle, questioning the assumptions about the diffraction orders and how they relate to the observed maxima. Some participants explore the implications of adjacent maxima and the conditions for missing orders.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of the diffraction orders and their implications for calculating the slit width. Some participants express concerns about the accuracy of their calculations, while others clarify the conditions necessary for the observed maxima. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach, but several lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves specific constraints regarding the orders of maxima and the implications of having no fourth-order maxima. There is also mention of rounding preferences affecting the perceived accuracy of calculations.

Oijl
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Light of wavelength 680 nm is incident normally on a diffraction grating. Two adjacent maxima occur at angles given by sin θ = 0.2 and sin θ = 0.3, respectively. The fourth-order maxima are missing.

(b) What is the smallest slit width this grating can have?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


What equations relate slit width to angle theta?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The diffraction orders do not have to be 1 and 2. Actually they are not.
You don't need to assume their values. The information that the maxima are adjacent is enough. With your notation, that means m2=m1+1.
You can find both d and m1,m2 from the equations (with the above condition).
 
Yes, I had tried that, but it gave me values that I thought were too far from the correct answer (which I knew the value of). I've looked at all the numbers more closely, and it's just rounding preferences, is all the matter.

Thanks.
 
I edited the first post, to make it about the second part of the problem, for which I cannot think of any equations.
 
There is nothing about rounding. The diffraction orders are 1 and 2 (in the first part).
The same equation will give the minimum size of the slit. The condition is that you have only the maxima with orders 0 to 3 and nothing at 4.
That means that the sin(theta) will have to be l>= 1 for order 4.
 
There is nothing about rounding. The diffraction orders are 2 and 3 (in the first part).
The same equation will give the minimum size of the slit. The condition is that you have only the maxima with orders 0 to 3 and nothing at 4.
That means that the sin(theta) will have to be l>= 1 for order 4.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K