Diffraction gratings - calculating the highest order maximum

Click For Summary
To determine the highest order maximum for monochromatic light of wavelength 694 nm incident on a diffraction grating with 2192 lines per centimeter, the equation dsinθ = mλ is used, where d is the grating spacing. The grating spacing is calculated as d = 1/2192 cm, which converts to meters for accurate calculations. The maximum order m can be found by rearranging the equation to m = dsinθ/λ, but the maximum angle θ must be considered, as sinθ cannot exceed 1. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the value of d and emphasizes that diffraction occurs only when d is comparable to the wavelength. Ultimately, the highest observable order maximum is determined to be 6.
Marcargo
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Monochromatic light of wavelength 694. nm is incident on a diffraction grating with 2192 lines per centimetre. What is the highest order maximum that can be observed?



Homework Equations



dsinθ = mλ

The Attempt at a Solution



d = 2192/cm = 21.92/m
λ = 694 x 10 -9m
sinθ = ?

m = dsinθ/λ
= (2192 x sinθ)/(694 x 10-9

I think that this is the equation to use, but I'm not sure what angle to use. I initially tried 90 for θ, but then logically thinking about it, that wouldn't work as light travels only in straight lines. Not sure how to carry on from here. Some insight would help!

Thanks







n.b. Given answer = 6
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the highest angle possible?

But I don't believe that value for d ... it's 11 orders of magnitude bigger than the wavelength!
You only get diffraction if d is comparable to the wavelength otherwise we'd see baseball diffraction around doorways.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
965
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
972
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
27K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K