I Diffraction of point source/s and duality

Click For Summary
A single point source produces a single peak in diffraction patterns, while two point sources create fringes due to interference effects. This phenomenon can be explained through classical wave mechanics, without the need for quantum mechanics, as the patterns are well understood from historical studies. The initial conditions, such as whether one or two slits are open, determine the resulting diffraction pattern. Quantum mechanics may be applied to analyze the wavefunction of point sources, particularly in terms of superposition and diffusion. Ultimately, the distinction between single and dual sources is rooted in the principles of wave behavior rather than solely in quantum theory.
jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
TL;DR
1 point source and 2 points on a screen, only quantum duality explains this ?
Consider 1 and 2 point sources. Then corpuscular view gives a single peak in those cases, whereas considering the undulation of a quantity along the path gives fringes in both cases.

My question is : is it true that the case single point source gives a single peak and two would give fringes. The point is that only the duality wave/particle of quantum mechanics can explain this (for example collision of particles from several point sources does not exhibit interferences)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk22 said:
is it true that the case single point source gives a single peak and two would give fringes.
No. A singe slit produces a single-slit diffraction pattern and the math we use to calculate this pattern (no QM involved, it's classical wave mechanics, well understood in the 19th century) and we use the same equations to calculate the pattern. The only difference is the initial conditions - one slit open or two.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
I mean an idealized point source not a slit. But quantum mechanics could be involved by computing the diffusion of a delta function or 2 and superposing the resulting wavefunction at different times. In the case of one source, the wf after the source is a chirp of modulus 1, but the factor in front is 1/t. Knowing the particle is traveling at c, ##t=\sqrt{x^2+d^2}## with d the distance to screen, this gives a Lorentzian at power dimension of speed's space divided by 2.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads