I Diffraction of point source/s and duality

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
TL;DR Summary
1 point source and 2 points on a screen, only quantum duality explains this ?
Consider 1 and 2 point sources. Then corpuscular view gives a single peak in those cases, whereas considering the undulation of a quantity along the path gives fringes in both cases.

My question is : is it true that the case single point source gives a single peak and two would give fringes. The point is that only the duality wave/particle of quantum mechanics can explain this (for example collision of particles from several point sources does not exhibit interferences)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk22 said:
is it true that the case single point source gives a single peak and two would give fringes.
No. A singe slit produces a single-slit diffraction pattern and the math we use to calculate this pattern (no QM involved, it's classical wave mechanics, well understood in the 19th century) and we use the same equations to calculate the pattern. The only difference is the initial conditions - one slit open or two.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
I mean an idealized point source not a slit. But quantum mechanics could be involved by computing the diffusion of a delta function or 2 and superposing the resulting wavefunction at different times. In the case of one source, the wf after the source is a chirp of modulus 1, but the factor in front is 1/t. Knowing the particle is traveling at c, ##t=\sqrt{x^2+d^2}## with d the distance to screen, this gives a Lorentzian at power dimension of speed's space divided by 2.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top