Dimension Analysis: α,β in x=α+(2/3)βt^(3/2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter studentofphy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Dimension
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the physical dimensions and SI units of the constants α and β in the equation x=α+(2/3)βt^(3/2), where x represents position and t represents time.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the dimensional analysis of the equation, particularly focusing on how to derive the dimensions of β from the relationship between x and t.
  • Some participants question the existence of an SI unit corresponding to the derived dimensions of β, leading to further exploration of unit combinations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the dimensional relationships within the equation. Some participants have provided algebraic manipulations to clarify the dimensions of β, while others express uncertainty regarding the SI units associated with the derived dimensions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of finding standard SI units for certain combinations of dimensions, indicating a broader discussion about the limitations of unit nomenclature in physics.

studentofphy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the following expression x is a position and t represents time. What are the physical dimensions of each of the constants α and β? Also, for each what are the corresponding SI units?

Homework Equations



x=α+(2/3)βt^(3/2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that since x is a position, it must have the dimension of L and the unit of m. That makes the right have a dimension of L as well. That said [α]=L, but the β is throwing me off because of the t^(3/2). I can't for the life of me figure out how to manipulate that exponent to end of with a dimension of L or L/T or L/T^2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically, the strategy for finding the units of β is to make sure all other units cancel besides one power of [x].

Since the factor of 2/3 doesn't matter (it is unitless or "dimensionless"), and you already have figured out α, we can write:

[x]=[βt3/2] = [β] [t]3/2
where the square brackets mean "the units of" whatever is enclosed. One way to solve for the units of [β] is to use algebra (really some sort of pseudo algebra, but everything works out just fine) like this:

[x]/[t]3/2 = [β]
or
[β]=[x][t]-3/2

So this means the units of β are units of length times time to the power -3/2, or meters per root second cubed.

If you plug this in you can verify the result:
[β t3/2] = [β] [t]3/2 = ([x][t]-3/2) [t]3/2 = [x]
as desired.
 
Try to figure out what must be the dimensions of β so that the dimensions of βt^{3/2} ends up as L.
 
I tried this approach and it made sense algebraically. However, I don't know of an SI unit associated with [x][t]^-3/2. Am I missing something?
 
studentofphy said:
I tried this approach and it made sense algebraically. However, I don't know of an SI unit associated with [x][t]^-3/2. Am I missing something?

Yes; the SI unit is \mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{s}^{-3/2}.

The formula y = x^a t^b makes dimensional sense for any real a and b, and if x and t are measured in metres and seconds respectively then y will be measured in units of \mathrm{m}^a\,\mathrm{s}^b.
 
It's a tragedy that there isn't an SI unit with dimensions of LT^(-3/2), but it's still OK if a quantity has units which are a mixture of only basic units. There simply aren't enough people to provide names for every combination of basic units.
 
Thank you so much. Being a new physics students I made a rookie mistake in assuming the only dimensions were the ones listed on a chart with quantities.
 
I mean, I already told you the name of the unit:
meters per root second cubed
Is it a problem that the units of acceleration are meters per second squared? That is an extremely commonly used one, as in g=9.8 m/s2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K