Dimension of the span of a set of vectors

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the dimension of the span of a set of vectors in the context of linear algebra, specifically whether a set of vectors can have a dimension equal to n without spanning the entirety of R^n. The scope includes theoretical considerations and clarifications regarding vector spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether a set of vectors can have a dimension equal to n without spanning R^n, indicating a lack of clarity in interpreting the dimension of the span.
  • One participant asserts that there cannot be a proper n-dimensional subspace of an n-dimensional vector space, suggesting that any n-dimensional subspace must be the whole space.
  • Another participant points out a potential error in notation regarding the number of vectors in the set, suggesting that the original notation may have been intended to indicate n distinct vectors.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of the number of vectors (m) in relation to n, noting that if m is less than n, the span cannot equal R^n, while if m is greater than or equal to n, the span might or might not equal R^n.
  • A later reply seeks to clarify that the question is about whether a set of vectors with a span dimension of n necessarily spans R^n, suggesting that this is a more concise way to frame the inquiry.
  • Participants agree that the condition of having dim(span(A)) = n implies that m must be greater than or equal to n.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the dimension of the span and the relationship between the number of vectors and the dimension of the space. While some points of clarification are reached, the discussion remains unresolved regarding the initial question of whether a set can have a dimension equal to n without spanning R^n.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of span and dimension, as well as the implications of the number of vectors in the set. The notation used in the initial posts may have contributed to confusion about the number of vectors involved.

MostlyHarmless
Messages
344
Reaction score
15
My linear algebra is a bit rusty.

Let ##A=\{\bar{v}_1, \dots, \bar{v}_1\}## be a set of vectors in ##R^n##. Can dim(span##(A))=n## without spanning ##R^n##?

I guess I'm unclear on how to interpret the dimension of the span of a set of vectors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The span of a set of vectors is a vector space. There cannot be a proper n-dimensional subspace of an n-dimensional vector space. Any n-dimensional subspace must be the whole thing.

That is one area where vector spaces differ from modules.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MostlyHarmless
MostlyHarmless said:
My linear algebra is a bit rusty.

Let ##A=\{\bar{v}_1, \dots, \bar{v}_1\}## be a set of vectors in ##R^n##. Can dim(span##(A))=n## without spanning ##R^n##?

I guess I'm unclear on how to interpret the dimension of the span of a set of vectors.
Are there n vectors in A? Your subscripts all appear to be 1. Presumably you meant ##\{\bar{v}_1, \dots, \bar{v}_n\}##.
 
Mark44 said:
Are there n vectors in A? Your subscripts all appear to be 1. Presumably you meant ##\{\bar{v}_1, \dots, \bar{v}_n\}##.

Yeah that second, 1 should have been an m. Not necessarily an n. (at least I don't think it should necessarily be an n).
 
andrewkirk said:
The span of a set of vectors is a vector space. There cannot be a proper n-dimensional subspace of an n-dimensional vector space. Any n-dimensional subspace must be the whole thing.

That is one area where vector spaces differ from modules.

Ok, this is exactly what I needed to know!

I've not gotten to modules yet. I'm taking a second graduate Algebra class next semester though. I'm told we will finally get into them then.
 
MostlyHarmless said:
Yeah that second, 1 should have been an m. Not necessarily an n. (at least I don't think it should necessarily be an n).
Then you should specify some condition on m. If m < n, then your set of vectors could not possibly span ##\mathbb{R}^n##, since dim(span(A)) ##\le m < n##. If ##m \ge n##, the set of vectors might span ##\mathbb{R}^n##, or might not.
 
The only condition I wanted on m is that it was not necessarily equal to n. So that it was truly an arbitrary set of vectors in ##R^n##. That way the question was just: "Given an arbitrary set of vectors, A, such that dim(span(A)) = n. Does A necessarily span ##R^n##?" This is a more concise way of asking the question.. I believe the two questions are equivalent though. If not, this is definitely the question I mean to ask.

Which the answer appears to be yes... as per andrewkirk.

Edit: I guess the condition that dim(span(A))=n forces the condition that ##m\geq n##.
 
MostlyHarmless said:
Edit: I guess the condition that dim(span(A))=n forces the condition that m n .
Yes
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K