Dimensional Analysis: Combining 3 Variables

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of combining three variables—R, μ, and dp/dx—into a dimensionless product. The user confirms that their dimensional analysis approach is correct, noting the dimensions of each variable and setting up a system of equations to demonstrate that these variables cannot yield a dimensionless parameter. They conclude that the only solution requires a=0, which is not physically meaningful for R. The method is validated as effective for determining the dimensional relationships among variables, affirming its reliability for future analyses.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Hi. I have a function that contains 4 variables: Q, R, \mu, dp/dx

I wish to choose 3 of them, such that they cannot be combined into a dimensionless product.I have chosen (correctly) R, \mu, dp/dx and I would like to know if my method sounds correct:

If we know the dimensions: [R]=[L] [\mu]=[ML-2T-2] and [dp/dx]=[ML-1T-1]and I know that in order for them to be dimensionless, their power product must equal zero:

[L]a[ML-1T-1]b[ML-2T-2]c=[MLT]0

or the system

a-b-2c=0
b+c=0
-b-2c=0

By inspection, this system can only be satisfied if a=0 but that does not make any sense since R is a physical quantity.

Hence I have reasoned that these 3 variable cannot form a non-dimensional parameter by themselves.Does this work? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignore length real quick. [MT^{ - 1} ]^a [MT^{ - 2} ]^b can NEVER be dimensionless (except for a=b=0)
 
Pengwuino said:
Ignore length real quick. [MT^{ - 1} ]^a [MT^{ - 2} ]^b can NEVER be dimensionless (except for a=b=0)

Okay cool!

Also, though longer and more tiresome, my method above works right? For the same reason.

I just want a general method just in case inspection is not that obvious.
 
Yes, that method works.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
795
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
951
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
18K