Dimensional analysis of an equation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the dimensional analysis of an equation from a 5D Supergravity model, specifically questioning the balance of units between the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) of the equation M^2_{p_l} ∼ M^3_{p_l(5)} ~ R^3. Participants highlight that in natural units, the length unit equates to GeV^{-1}, which is crucial for ensuring dimensional consistency. Concerns are raised about the validity of the equation if dimensional balance is not maintained, as physical equations should adhere to correct dimensional analysis. Additionally, the origin of the equation in question is unclear, prompting further inquiry into its derivation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of dimensional analysis in theoretical physics.
Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
In extra dimensions models like ADD model [paper][1] the relation between the extra dimensions Planck scale ##M_{p_l(5)} ##, the 4-dimensional Planck scale ## M_{p_l}##, and the size of the extra dimension ##R## for a single extra dimension ( ## n=1## ) is given by:
Relevant Equations
## M^2_{p_l} \sim M^3_{p_l(5)} ~ R##
The units in this equation are equal on the right and the left-hand side of the equation since in natural units, the length unit = GeV## ^{-1} ##.

Now my question about this [paper][2], where it's a 5D Supergravity model and alternatively the above relation is given by :

## M^2_{p_l} \sim M^3_{p_l(5)} ~ R^3 ##

I wonder is there units or dimensional balance between the RHS and the LHS in this equation? And if not, is this equation any more valid, since any physical equation should have correct dimensional analysis.

Any help is appreciated!

[1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9803315
[2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09166
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Safinaz said:
Relevant Equations: ## M^2_{p_l} \sim M^3_{p_l(5)} ~ R##

.
Now my question about this [paper][2], where it's a 5D Supergravity model and alternatively the above relation is given by :

## M^2_{p_l} \sim M^3_{p_l(5)} ~ R^3 ##
An area I know little about, so apologies if this is off the mark.

In your 2nd paper, equation (3) is: ##M^2_{Pl} \sim M^{2+n}_{Pl(4+n)} R^n##
With n=1: ## M^2_{Pl} \sim M^3_{Pl(5)} R##
With n=3: ##M^2_{Pl} \sim M^5_{Pl(7_)} R^3##

It is not clear where your (inhomogeous) equation ## M^2_{p_l} \sim M^3_{p_l(5)} ~ R^3## comes from.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K