Dimensional Analysis with non-dimensional initial parameter

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on non-dimensionalizing equations for a non-Newtonian fluid model, specifically addressing the challenge of incorporating a non-dimensional parameter, n, from the power-law model. The initial concern was how to include this parameter in accordance with Buckingham's Pi theorem, despite its non-dimensional nature. The solution identified is that the consistency index, K, inherently includes the non-dimensional parameter, allowing it to be excluded from consideration with other dimensional quantities. This realization simplifies the process of forming non-dimensional parameters for the fluid model. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how dependent parameters can encapsulate non-dimensional aspects in fluid dynamics.
Zoli
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I would like non-dimensionalize the equations which describe a non-Newtonian fluid model. In the constitutive equation (power-law model) there is a non-dimensional parameter: n. According to Buckingham's Pi theory, I must take all the relevant independent parameters (variables, constants, etc.) into account to form non-dimensional parameters. Parameter n should also be included, but (since it is non-dimensional) it will not appear anywhere. How can I handle this situation? I am sure that there are other areas in physics where initially known non-dimensional parameters turn up.

Thanks,
Zoli
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I managed to solve it.
 
How did you solve it? I have to admit I was stumped and hoped for an answer.
 
DaleSpam said:
How did you solve it? I have to admit I was stumped and hoped for an answer.

I realized that a dependent parameter (the consistency index: K[Pa s^n]) includes this non-dimensional parameter and this is the only one that changes when we consider a power-law fluid instead of a Newtonian fluid. Therefore we do not have to take this non-dimensional parameter into account as for the other quantities.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
948
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K