Dimensional Regularization of an Integral

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of renormalizing a UV-divergent integral using Dimensional Regularization, particularly when the integrand does not conform to standard forms found in existing literature. The integral in question involves a complex expression with both temporal and spatial momentum components, complicating the application of established techniques. Participants discuss the differences between parameters in the integral and suggest potential methods for integration, including transforming the integral into a form that can be analyzed through known techniques. The main inquiry revolves around the applicability of Leibbrandt's prescription, which is typically designed for propagator-like integrals, and seeks guidance on extending this approach to different forms. The thread highlights the need for further resources or generalizations to effectively apply Dimensional Regularization in this context.
Sunset
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I want to renormalize the following UV-divergent integral using Dimensional Regularization:

\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \frac{d^4 p}{\left(2 \pi \right)^4} \frac{1}{a p_0^2 +\left(a p_x^2+a p_y^2+a p_z^2 +M^2\right)^2}

a>0

I can only find literature which deals with integrands f \left(p\right), i.e. the components of p=(p_0,p_x,p_y,p_z) do not appear isollated as in my integral above. I found for example on p.854 (M>0) resp. p.862 (M=0) of "Leibbrandt: Introduction into the technique of Dimensional regularization" (see http://prola.aps.org/abstract/RMP/v47/i4/p849_1" ) a general prescription how to do DimReg, but I guess I cannot apply it in my case.

Maybe step (ii) would be \frac{1}{a p_0^2 +\left(a p_x^2+a p_y^2+a p_z^2 +M^2\right)^2} = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{ - \alpha \left(a p_0^2 + \left[a p_x^2+a p_y^2 + a p_z^2 + M^2\right]^2 \right) }

But step (iii) I cannot perfom because I don't have a generalised gaussian integral. Unfortunately I haven't found a corresponding formulae for my case...


Maybe someone of you has an idea how the prescription in the URL can be generalised, or where to look for a hint how to cope with the integral?

Martin
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm a bit confused. what's the difference between M and p0? I guess its some four-dim relativistic stuff you are doing?

you could at least integrate d^3p=4*pi*p^2*dp and integrate out that analytic first, but then you get p0 left, which is hard to integrate out.
 
Hi!

sorry, I wasn't able to read & write until today, due to the server problems.

The integral is a divergent part of a thermal integral (finite temperature field theory). I carried out the Matsubara Sum and I received the contribution \int \frac{d^3 \bf{k} }{\left( 2 \pi \right)^3 } \frac{T}{\epsilon^2_z}

I introduced a integration over \kappa to receive an integral over 4 real-valued momenta.

\int \frac{d^3 \bf{k} }{\left( 2 \pi \right)^3 } \frac{T}{\epsilon^2_z} = \int \frac{d^3 \bf{k} }{\left( 2 \pi \right)^3 } \frac{T Z}{\pi} \int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} d \kappa \ \frac{1}{Z^2 \kappa^2 + \epsilon^4_z}

with \sqrt{Z^2 \bf{k}^2 +M^2 } \equiv \epsilon_z

Leibbrandts prescription is also for such integrals but he assumes that the integral is made of propagators. Although my integrand looks similar to a propagator, it differs from it because of the +signs instead of the -signs from the euclidean metric (I guess that caused your confusion)

My question is mainly: why does the prescription of Leibbrandt assume that there are always propagators in the integrals you want to dimReg-ularise...? There are definitely others! Where can such a prescription be found? Or how can Leibbrandts be applied to others?

I managed to renormalize the above integral with a CT-scheme, but I would like to know how it is with DimReg...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
908
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K