Dimensional Regularization of Feynman Integrals

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the derivation of specific equations related to dimensional regularization of Feynman integrals, particularly focusing on an equation from Peskin and Schroeder's book. Participants seek clarification on the derivation process and equivalent expressions for certain types of integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests an explanation for a specific equation related to loop integrals and dimensional regularization from Peskin and Schroeder's book.
  • Another participant shares a link to their QFT manuscript, suggesting it contains relevant information for the derivation.
  • A participant identifies three critical expansions necessary for the derivations, including expressions for the Gamma function and logarithmic terms, and questions the correctness of their reasoning.
  • Another participant mentions that a more detailed derivation can be found in their manuscript, specifically in a section that reviews necessary functions for evaluating integrals.
  • A participant acknowledges that they found relevant equations in the manuscript and indicates that they are more interested in justifying the forms of the equations rather than replicating proofs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion does not appear to reach a consensus, as participants express varying degrees of understanding and seek clarification on different aspects of the derivation process.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions and dependencies on definitions are present, particularly regarding the expansions of the Gamma function and the specific forms of integrals being discussed. The discussion also reflects a reliance on external resources for deeper understanding.

nigelscott
Messages
133
Reaction score
4
I am looking at Appendix A Equation 52 (Loop Integrals and Dimensional Regularization) in Peskin and Schroeder's book.

∫ddk/(2π)d1/(k2 - Δ)2 = Γ(2-d/2)/(4π)2(1/Δ)2-d/2 = (1/4π)2(2/ε - logΔ - γ + log4π)

Can somebody explain how this equation is derived? I would also like to know what the equivalent expression is for integrals of the type 1/(k2 - m2) and k2/(k2 - m2)2. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks. There's a lot of heavy math in there but I think I got the main idea. It seems that the following 3 expansions are critical to the derivations. To first order, omitting factors of π etc and putting Δ = m2:

a. Γ(ε) = 1/ε - γ

b. Γ(ε - 1) = -1/ε + γ - 1 (from WolframAlpha)

c. (1/Δ)2-d/2 = 1 - (1 - d/2)logΔ.

Therefore, for (c) we get (1/Δ)ε = 1 - εlogΔ and for 1 - d/2 we get (1/Δ)ε-1 = (1/Δ)ε(1/Δ)-1 = (1 - εlogΔ)Δ

When I multiply these terms together in the right combinations I seem to get the expressions that I was looking for. Is my reasoning correct? Thanks again.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Raymont
It's a bit lenghty to post the full calculation here in the forums, but you find a (so I hope) pretty self-contained derivation of the formulae in Appendix C of my manuscript in Section 5.3 (including a review about the ##\Gamma## and ##\mathrm{B}## functions needed to do the integrals. Together with Feynman parametrization that's all you need to evaluate simple Feynman diagrams as also demonstrated in the manuscript.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Raymont
Thanks again. I think C.14 and C.15 in the Appendix are basically what I was looking for. C.15 would seem to correspond to Peskin's A.51. My intention here was to justify the form of each equation rather that replicate the exact proofs. I think the expansion of Γ(∈) and Γ(∈ - 1) were the missing pieces.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Raymont and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K