Dirac's Rest Mass in Minowski Spacetime

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Dirac's rest mass cannot be accurately represented as a fourth dimension within Minkowski spacetime. The discussion highlights the inconsistency of expressing rest mass, measured in kilograms, as a spatial dimension, which is measured in meters. The proposed formula S^2=x^2+y^2+z^2+(rest-mass dimension)^2-(ct)^2 is deemed nonsensical, emphasizing the fundamental differences between mass and spatial dimensions. The participants conclude that Dirac's interpretation of rest mass does not align with the principles of Minkowski spacetime.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski spacetime concepts
  • Familiarity with Dirac's theories in physics
  • Basic knowledge of dimensional analysis
  • Grasp of the differences between mass and spatial dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Minkowski spacetime and its implications in physics
  • Study Dirac's contributions to quantum mechanics and relativity
  • Explore dimensional analysis in theoretical physics
  • Investigate the relationship between mass and spacetime in modern physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the intersection of mass and spacetime concepts.

Bob Dylan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Dirac's rest mass seems to be expressed as a fourth dimension. If we were to try to include this rest-mass dimension into Minowski space time, could it be expressed as a distance in space? S^2=x^2+y^2+z^2+(rest-mass dimension)^2-(ct)^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the dimensions in your expression! You'll see that it doesn't make any sense, and I'm pretty sure Dirac has never written such a nonsensical formula ;-).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
Thank you again for the reply. Was I mistaken then in thinking of rest mass as a fourth dimension?
 
Of course, how can a mass (dimension kg in the SI) be a fourth dimension of space (dimension metre in the SI)? It's simply not making the slightest sense! Where have you gotten this idea from?
 
Bob Dylan said:
Dirac's rest mass seems to be expressed as a fourth dimension.

Where are you getting that from?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K