Direct detection of Planck mass WIMPs?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the sensitivity of current dark matter detection experiments to Planck mass Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs). It is established that the CDMS experiment's parameter space only extends to WIMP masses of 1000 GeV, and heavier particles, such as those at Planck mass, are exceedingly rare and difficult to detect due to their weak interactions. The conversation highlights that detectable heavy dark matter presents inherent contradictions, such as the inability to remain in thermal equilibrium and the implications of overclosing the universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of WIMP-nucleon cross section and its implications
  • Familiarity with dark matter density and its relation to particle mass
  • Knowledge of thermal relics and Boltzmann suppression
  • Concept of freeze-in mechanisms in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of WIMP-nucleon cross section limits in dark matter experiments
  • Study the relationship between particle mass and dark matter density
  • Explore the concept of thermal relics and their role in dark matter detection
  • Investigate freeze-in mechanisms and their significance in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and researchers in dark matter studies who are exploring the properties and detection challenges of heavy dark matter particles.

jcap
Messages
166
Reaction score
12
Are the current dark matter detection experiments sensitive to Planck mass WIMPs?

I've just looked at the Wikipedia WIMP article. It shows the excluded parameter space for the CDMS experiment with WIMP-nucleon cross section vs WIMP mass curves but they only go up to a WIMP mass of 1000 GeV.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, there is nothing magical about the Planck mass.

Second, since the dark matter mass density is known (1/3 of a proton mass per cc), the heavier each individual particle is, the fewer of them are out there to detect. Long before you get to the Planck mass, you have too few particles to have a decent chance of spotting one.

Third, the weaker the interaction, the fewer particles were produced in the early universe. To get the sorts of low number densities implied by heavy particles means they interact very weakly indeed, which also makes them very hard to detect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Prav001 and ohwilleke
Vanadium 50 said:
Third, the weaker the interaction, the fewer particles were produced in the early universe. To get the sorts of low number densities implied by heavy particles means they interact very weakly indeed, which also makes them very hard to detect.

A thermal relic becomes more abundant the weaker it interacts due to falling out of equilibrium earlier and therefore getting less Boltzmann suppressed. A very strongly interacting species would remain in thermal equilibrium longer and if the freeze-out temperature is much lower than its mass the Boltzmann suppression becomes very large.

That being said, it is unclear whether a particle of such a large mass as the Planck mass would ever be in thermal equilibrium to start with. It would more likely already be decoupled at the reheating temperature and therefore not really be produced in the early Universe. In such a situation, you will instead have a freeze-in mechanism, for which it is true that a weaker interaction gives a lower final density.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
I also doubt something that heavy is in equilibrium.

Maybe here's a better way to express my thinking: detectable heavy dark matter has built-in contradictions. For example, if it interacts strongly, it will clump - and we know it doesn't. And/or it overcloses the universe. And it doesn't do that either.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K