Direct Products and Sums of Modules - Notation - 2nd Post

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules Notation Sums
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on understanding the notation and concepts presented in John Dauns' book "Modules and Rings," specifically in Section 1-2 regarding Direct Products and Sums of modules. The user seeks clarification on the functions α and β, which map an index set I = {1, 2, 3} to a union of right R-Modules A, B, and C. The operations on the product A × B × C are confirmed to follow standard module addition and scalar multiplication rules, with the functions defined as α(i) ∈ Mi for i = 1, 2, 3. The clarification provided confirms the user's understanding of the notation and operations involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of R-Modules and their properties
  • Familiarity with functions and mappings in set theory
  • Knowledge of direct products and sums in algebra
  • Basic operations of addition and scalar multiplication in modules
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of direct sums in module theory
  • Explore the properties of functions in the context of algebraic structures
  • Learn about isomorphisms in module theory
  • Investigate examples of R-Modules and their direct products
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying module theory who seek to deepen their understanding of direct products and sums of modules.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading John Dauns book "Modules and Rings". I am having problems understanding the notation of Section 1-2 Direct Products and Sums (pages 5-6) - see attachment).

In section 1-2.1 Dauns writes:

================================================== ======

"1-2.1 For any arbitrary family of modules
png.latex
indexed by an arbitrary index set,

the product
png.latex
is defined by the set of all functions

png.latex
such that
png.latex
for all i which becomes an

R-Module under pointwise operations,
png.latex
and

png.latex
"

================================================== ======

I have tried a simple example in rder to understand Dauns notation.

Consider a family of right R-Modules A, B, and C

Let I be an index set I = {1,2,3} so that $$ M_1 = A, M_2 = B, M_3 = C $$

Then we have

$$ \Pi M_i = M_1 \times M_2 \times M_3 = A \times B \times C $$

My problem now is to understand (exactly) the set of functions

$$ \alpha, \beta : I \rightarrow \cup \{ M_i | i \in I \}$$ such that $$ \alpha (i) \in M_i $$ for all i

where I am assuming that $$ \cup \{ M_i | i \in I \} = M_1 \cup M_2 \cup M_3 $$

So my problem here is what precisely are the functions $$ \alpha , \beta $$ in this example.

Can someone please help and clarify this matter?

====================================Note: Since the operations in $$ A \times B \times C $$ would, i imagine be as follows:

$$ (a_1, b_1, c_1) + (a_2, b_2, c_2) = (a_1 + a_2, b_1 + b_2, c_1 + c_2) $$

and

$$ (a_1, b_1, c_1)r = (a_1r, b_1r, c_1r)$$ for $$ r \in R $$

one would imagine that $$ \alpha (1) = a_1 , \alpha (2) = b_1 , \alpha (3) = c_1 $$

and $$ \beta (1) = a_2 , \beta (2) = b_2 , \beta (3) = c_2 $$

Can someone confirm this?

Mind you I am guessing and cannot see why this follows from $$ \alpha, \beta : I \rightarrow \cup \{ M_i | i \in I \}$$ such that $$ \alpha (i) \in M_i $$ for all i
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Consider a family of right R-Modules A, B, and C

Let I be an index set I = {1,2,3} so that $$ M_1 = A, M_2 = B, M_3 = C $$

Then we have

$$ \Pi M_i = M_1 \times M_2 \times M_3 = A \times B \times C $$

My problem now is to understand (exactly) the set of functions

$$ \alpha, \beta : I \rightarrow \cup \{ M_i | i \in I \}$$ such that $$ \alpha (i) \in M_i $$ for all i

where I am assuming that $$ \cup \{ M_i | i \in I \} = M_1 \cup M_2 \cup M_3 $$

So my problem here is what precisely are the functions $$ \alpha , \beta $$ in this example.

Can someone please help and clarify this matter?
Well, you described $\alpha$ and $\beta$. There are two ways to look at them, which are isomorphic. The easiest is to see $\alpha$ as an ordered triple $(\alpha_i,\alpha_2,\alpha_3)$ where $\alpha_i\in M_i$ for $i=1,2,3$. Now, if instead of $\alpha_i$ we write $\alpha(i)$, this shows the second way: $\alpha$ is a single function from $\{1,2,3\}$ such that $\alpha(i)\in M_i$ for $i=1,2,3$. Do you see that $$ \alpha: I \rightarrow \cup \{ M_i\mid i \in I \}$$ such that $$ \alpha (i) \in M_i $$ for all $i$?

Peter said:
Note: Since the operations in $$ A \times B \times C $$ would, i imagine be as follows:

$$ (a_1, b_1, c_1) + (a_2, b_2, c_2) = (a_1 + a_2, b_1 + b_2, c_1 + c_2) $$

and

$$ (a_1, b_1, c_1)r = (a_1r, b_1r, c_1r)$$ for $$ r \in R $$

one would imagine that $$ \alpha (1) = a_1 , \alpha (2) = b_1 , \alpha (3) = c_1 $$

and $$ \beta (1) = a_2 , \beta (2) = b_2 , \beta (3) = c_2 $$

Can someone confirm this?
Yes, your understanding of the structure of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ and operations on them is correct.
 
Thank you for your help and guidance, Evgeny

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K