Electric Current Direction: + to - or - to +?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Direction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The conventional direction of electric current is defined as flowing from positive (+) to negative (-), despite the actual flow of charge carriers, such as electrons, which move from - to +. In conductors, electrons are the primary charge carriers, resulting in a negative current direction relative to conventional current. In semiconductors, both electrons and holes contribute to current flow, with electrons moving from - to + and holes moving from + to -. This historical convention stems from early experiments by Benjamin Franklin and has persisted due to unchanged educational materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric charge and its types (positive and negative).
  • Familiarity with the concept of current density and the formula I = dq/dt.
  • Basic knowledge of conductors and semiconductors.
  • Awareness of historical context in electrical engineering conventions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of charge carriers in different materials, focusing on conductors and semiconductors.
  • Study the implications of the formula I = dq/dt in various electrical contexts.
  • Explore the historical development of electrical theory and its impact on modern conventions.
  • Learn about the behavior of positive ions in electrolytes and their contribution to electric current.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics and electrical engineering, educators in the field, and professionals seeking to understand the nuances of electric current direction and its historical context.

chound
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
Can electric current be made to flow from + to - and - to + at the same time?
And does it normally flow from + to - or - to +?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
First of all, current doesn't flow. Charge flows. The conventional direction of the current is from + to -, and this direction can be the same as the direction of actual charge flow or the opposite, depending on the type of the charge carrier. As you know, the formula of definition for the electric current is I = dq/dt.

Now, if we consider a conductor, in which the charge carrier is the electron which is a negative charge, the dq term will also be negative and so will be I in the direction of the electron flow. That's why the direction in which I will be positive is the opposite direction of actual electron flow, meaning that the electrons actually flow from - to +.

If we consider a semiconductor, in which there are two charge carriers - the electron and the hole (which is a positive charge) - the electric current will be given by the flow of both (electrons and holes). While the direction of the actual electrons flow will be from - to +, the direction of actual holes flow will be from + to - (the same as the conventional current direction) because for the hole current the dq term is positive.

So, yes, charge can flow from + to - and from - to + in the same time (for example in a PN junction) but the direction of the electric current is from + to -.
 
When Benjamin Franklin did his first experiments with electricity, he deduced that there are 2 charges and called them + and -

He also discovered that only one of these charges can move while the other is stationary. He didn't know which so he made a guess and said the current flow from + to - which is wrong. Then in 1900, J.J. Thompson discovered an electron and proved electrons are negative and that they flow to a positive charge.

In reality, - flow to +

Physicists use: - flow to +
Engineeers use: + flow to -

Why engineers use a wrong assumption? because during 1900's they didn't change their textbooks. So we are stuck with a wrong convection current.
 
I don't know the historical reasons for this convention, but I see this as a direct consequence of:
1) the definition of the intensity of the electric conduction current as
I = dq/dt
2) the convention that the electron has a negative charge

If either the definition of I was I = -(dq/dt) or the electron was considered to have a positive charge, then the conventional direction would have been the same as the direction of the electron flow.

But I don't consider this convention to be such a twisted thing because electric current can also result from the flow of positive charged particles (positive ions in electrolytes, and holes in semiconductors), so electric current doesn't necessary have to mean electron flow.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
1K