Direction of friction in circular motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the direction of friction in circular motion, specifically in the context of a body rotating on a rough turntable. Participants explore the relationship between friction, centripetal force, and the motion of the body when friction is present or absent.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question why friction acts radially inwards instead of tangentially, considering the slipping tendency of the body. There are discussions about the nature of centripetal acceleration and the role of friction in maintaining circular motion.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of friction and its relationship to motion. Some have offered clarifications regarding the definitions of slipping tendency and the distinction between acceleration and velocity in this context.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the relative motion of surfaces in contact and how this affects the direction of friction. Participants are navigating through concepts that may involve confusion between different frames of reference.

Vatsal Goyal
Messages
51
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


I can't understand why friction acts radially inwards when a body is rotating on a rough turntable. If the friction is removed, the body would move tangentially, hence it has slipping tendency tangential, not radially outwards, then shouldn't friction act tangentially?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The idea that friction acts radially inwards seems very counter-intuitive to me. I know that there has to be a centripetal force as the body is in circular motion, and a force is required to balance the centrifugal force, but why is it friction and why wouldn't it act tangentially bugs me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would move tangentially because there would be nothing to change its state of motion. In any motion with constant speed, the acceleration is orthogonal to the velocity. Any component of a resultant force that was tangential to the path would accelerate the object.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vatsal Goyal
Could you help me understand why it is the frictional force that provides centripetal acceleration. I am taught that frictional force acts opposite to the slipping tendency, then why does it act radially inwards if the slipping tendency is tangential.
 
Vatsal Goyal said:
I am taught that frictional force acts opposite to the slipping tendency,

Correct but the slipping tendency is not tangential...

If it was released it would indeed move tangentially to the circular path it was following BUT it moves more or less radially with respect to the point on the surface where it was previously sitting. So the relative motion, the red line, is radial (for small theta).

Relative motion.jpg


PS: It would be tangential if the rotating surface suddenly stopped rotating and the object kept going.
 

Attachments

  • Relative motion.jpg
    Relative motion.jpg
    9.9 KB · Views: 554
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vatsal Goyal and haruspex
CWatters said:
the slipping tendency is not tangential...
Just to stress that a bit more, slipping is relative motion of surfaces in contact; friction opposes that relative motion, not motion in the lab frame.
Also, part of your confusion comes from motion in the sense of acceleration versus in the sense of velocity. Without friction, there is no acceleration (in the lab frame) and the velocity is tangential. With static friction, the acceleration is radial and the velocity keeps changing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vatsal Goyal and CWatters

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K