Dirichlet's Approximation Theorem not working for n=8 and α= pi?

Click For Summary
Dirichlet's Approximation Theorem asserts that for any real number α and positive integer n, integers a and b can be found such that |aα - b| < 1/n. A user questioned why this theorem seemed not to hold for α = π and n = 8, as they could not find suitable integers a and b. They initially overlooked the importance of the absolute value in the inequality. Upon reevaluation, they recognized that the absolute value sign is crucial, which resolves their confusion. The theorem indeed applies universally, and careful consideration of the absolute value clarifies the situation.
ANphysics
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Dirichlet's Approximation Theorem not working for n=8 and α= pi?

I am reading a number theory textbook that states Dirichlet's Approximation Theorem as follows:

If α is a real number and n is a positive integer, then there exists integers a and b

with 1≤ a ≤ n such that |aα-b|< 1/n .

There is a proof of this theorem given in the text as well.

My question is if this theorem is suppose to be true for all real numbers α and positive integers n, then how come I cannot find integers a and b satisfying this inequality for α= pi and n = 8?

In this case since a is restricted to 1≤ a ≤ 8 it is easy to look for b by trying all 8 values for a:

1* pi = 3.14159...
2* pi = 6.28319...
3* pi = 9.42478...
4* pi = 12.5664...
5* pi = 15.708...
6* pi = 18.8496...
7* pi = 21.9911...
8* pi = 25.1327...

since "b" must also be an integer it is clear that the possibilities for b are 3,6,9,12,15,18,21,25.
However, none of these satisfy the inequality.

Since 1/8 = .125 the decimal values of the numbers I listed above for all the possible values of a should be less than .125 in one of the cases...but this does not happen. How can this be? I figure I must be overlooking something or computing something incorrectly because the theorem clearly states that such a, b can be found for all positive n and real α.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note it says |aα-b|< 1/n instead of (aα-b) < 1/n.
The difference is subtle but crucial. Now look again at 7*pi.
 
I completely overlooked the absolute value sign. Thank you for pointing this out!
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
844
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
897
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K