- #1
morrobay
Gold Member
- 1,099
- 1,528
Bell, QM Ideas - Science 177 1972 :" Strictly, however. a hidden variable theory could be non-deterministic; the hidden variable could evolve randomly (possibly even discontinuously) so that their values at one instant do not specify their values at the next instant"
From the locality assumption, (EPR on non-locality: " No reasonable definition of reality could be expected to permit this")
With no assumption of determinism or of classical behavior with probabilities p(ab|xy) that satisfy the locality decomposition
S = (a0b0+(a0b1) +(a1b0) - (a1b1) ≤ 2
Bell on realism: "That there should be definite outcomes possible for counter factual settings"
But are there formulations for predetermined values equivalent to those for locality ?
So given Bells definition of lambda above it seems you could expect that S = 2√2 and the QM predicted correlations and inequality violation. And that they suggest local non realism explanation.
From the locality assumption, (EPR on non-locality: " No reasonable definition of reality could be expected to permit this")
With no assumption of determinism or of classical behavior with probabilities p(ab|xy) that satisfy the locality decomposition
S = (a0b0+(a0b1) +(a1b0) - (a1b1) ≤ 2
Bell on realism: "That there should be definite outcomes possible for counter factual settings"
But are there formulations for predetermined values equivalent to those for locality ?
So given Bells definition of lambda above it seems you could expect that S = 2√2 and the QM predicted correlations and inequality violation. And that they suggest local non realism explanation.