Discontinuity at certain points

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding two specific functions, f and g, that are discontinuous at the points {1/n : n a positive integer} and {0} for f, and only at {1/n} for g, while remaining continuous elsewhere. One proposed solution for f is to define it as f(x) = 0 at the discontinuous points and f(x) = x elsewhere, although this only satisfies the conditions for g. Another suggestion is to use f(x) = 1 if x equals 1/n or 0, and 0 otherwise, which aims to create discontinuities. Additionally, a suggestion involves using the floor function, f(x) = [1/x], which introduces jump discontinuities at the specified points. The conversation highlights the challenge of constructing these functions while maintaining continuity in other regions.
rainwyz0706
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1.Find a function f : R → R which is discontinuous at the points of the set
{1/n : n a positive integer} ∪ {0} but is continuous everywhere else.
2. Find a function g : R → R which is discontinuous at the points of the set
{1/n : n a positive integer} but is continuous everywhere else.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm thinking of making f(x)=0 at points that f is discontinuous and f(x)=x everywhere else. But that only works for 2, not 1, right? Could anyone give me some hints? I'm not sure what the question is asking for. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not just f(x)= 1 if x= 1/n for some positive integer n or x= 0, 0 otherwise?
 
only discontinuous..?
try, f(x) =[1/x]...where...[y] is the greatest integer less than or equal to y or as you would call, floor(y)...f(1/n) leads to a jump discontinuity one you can never fix, and hence an implied non-differentiability.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
909
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K