Discover the Correct Star Radius with These Key Answers | Choose Wisely!

  • Thread starter Thread starter wanwa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around determining the correct star radius from a set of options, emphasizing the importance of understanding the underlying concepts rather than just providing answers. Participants clarify that the equation for star flux, L / (4πR^2), is relevant but not the main focus, as minimal math is required. A moderator reminds users of forum guidelines regarding homework help, encouraging explanations over direct answers. There is also a suggestion to consider observational perspectives during an occultation to aid understanding. Lastly, there is a note that the answer key may contain an error or typo.
wanwa
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A star shows periodic brightness variations indicating a transiting pair of stars. If the minimum stellar flux is 98.2 percent of the uncapped flux, what is the radius of the other star in that pair, in terms of stellar radius, assuming the other star does not radiate?
Relevant Equations
I have no idea which equations should be used, star Flux is = L / (4πR^2).

Thank you in advance for anyone trying to solve this question. If something odd/wrong with the question let me know (because the original question is on another language).
I have the key answer for this (choosing 1 answer)

A. 0,018

B. 1,134

C. 0,278

D. 0,974

E. 0,982
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show some sort of effort. If you don't know where to start, try explaining what you do understand about the problem and any thoughts you might have on how to solve it.
 
wanwa said:
star Flux is = L / (4πR^2).
Are you sure? According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiant_flux, it is the total power, not power per unit area. (And what is L?)
 
haruspex said:
Are you sure? According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiant_flux, it is the total power, not power per unit area. (And what is L?)
The equation is fine. However, it's not really relevant here. There's very little maths needed.

The poster is new to the site, so it bears explaining that the response in post #2 was not being cheeky. That's a moderator enforcing forum guidelines on homework help: We don't spell out answers, but we can guide you to them (this is the Way ;) ).

@wanwa just describe what you think an observer would see when looking at the occultation. Or which part of the larger star is giving out light during the event. Think in terms of areas.

Also, ar the risk of potentially giving out the answer, the answer key either contains a mistake or is mistyped in the OP.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444 and SammyS
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top