Discover the Importance of Diagonal Measurement in Computer Monitor Sizes

  • Thread starter Thread starter rgshankar76
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Monitor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Computer monitor sizes are measured diagonally due to historical conventions originating from the 1940s, primarily linked to the 3:4 aspect ratio used in film. This method simplifies the calculation of width and height by using a single diagonal measurement. However, with the advent of HDTV and the 16:9 aspect ratio, this convention has become less effective, as it does not provide accurate dimensions for screens of varying aspect ratios. Users express a preference for height dimensions to better understand screen size and usability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aspect ratios, particularly 3:4 and 16:9.
  • Familiarity with historical context of television and monitor design.
  • Knowledge of screen resolution and its impact on display quality.
  • Basic comprehension of CRT and LCD technology differences.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of aspect ratios on screen usability and viewer experience.
  • Learn about the evolution of monitor technology from CRT to LCD and beyond.
  • Explore how screen resolution affects clarity and detail in various applications.
  • Investigate current trends in monitor specifications and consumer preferences.
USEFUL FOR

Individuals interested in monitor technology, graphic designers, gamers, and anyone looking to optimize their workspace with the right display dimensions.

rgshankar76
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi

would like to know if some body can thro light on...

Why the Computer monitors Sizes are measured diagonally ?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
well, the ususal 3:4 aspect ratio (which had to do with the size of the negative in 35mm movie film after you subtracted for the perforations needed to pull it through a projector)
makes it very elegant to use diagonal length as the indicator of the size of the screen - instead of wrtinig both x and y, you can use d, and get x by dividing d by 5 and multiplying by 4, and you'd get y by dividing it by 5 and multiplying by 3... so an integer diagonal will get you an integer width and an integer height.
this convension has started in the 1940's,
with the introduction of HDTV it became more confusing, 9:16 doesn't give integers, and the area of the screen is deifferent for the same diagonal size in 3:4 and 9:16... but you can't chnage old habits.
 
Last edited:
So, yeah, the "dumb" answer is that's because TV screens are measured diagonally, so the same convention was carried over to monitors (unlike fargoth's eloquent explanation of why the convention originated for TVs). And, I find it rather frustrating that they've carried over the same convention to screens (monitors and TV) with different aspect ratios, because it no longer gives you a good idea of what size screen you're really going to get. Adding a few inches to the sides without increasing the height doesn't give you any larger text or images, it just allows you to fit more of them side-by-side. At this point, I'd prefer getting at least the height dimension.
 
Moonbear said:
At this point, I'd prefer getting at least the height dimension.
I've got a regular old CRT TV, so I prefer watching movies on my wide-aspect 20" LCD monitor, listening to my Klipsch speakers and subwoofer. It beats the pants off the TV for resolution and clarity and the sound is great. The extra width is also handy for keeping Outlook Express and a browser active and visible at the same time. And with this monitor, you can rotate it 90 degrees and switch the video card output from landscape to portrait in seconds, giving you the extra height that you want. The monitor is from Dell, but other seller have models with similar specs.
 
beter to get a average or absolute resolution and dimentions tahn diagonal dimension
 
I am having a hell of a time finding a good all-in-one inkjet printer. I must have gone through 5 Canon, 2 HP, one Brother, one Epson and two 4 X 6 photo printers in the last 7 yrs. all have all sort of problems. I don't even know where to start anymore. my price range is $180-$400, not exactly the cheapest ones. Mainly it's for my wife which is not exactly good in tech. most of the problem is the printers kept changing the way it operate. Must be from auto update. I cannot turn off the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
826
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K