The discussion revolves around the rationale behind measuring computer monitor sizes diagonally, exploring historical conventions, and the implications of this measurement method on understanding screen dimensions and usability.
Participants express differing views on the usefulness of diagonal measurements, with some advocating for the historical context and others questioning its relevance in modern usage. There is no consensus on whether diagonal measurements adequately represent screen size.
The discussion touches on the limitations of using diagonal measurements, particularly in relation to varying aspect ratios and the potential confusion this creates for consumers. There is also mention of personal preferences that may not apply universally.
I've got a regular old CRT TV, so I prefer watching movies on my wide-aspect 20" LCD monitor, listening to my Klipsch speakers and subwoofer. It beats the pants off the TV for resolution and clarity and the sound is great. The extra width is also handy for keeping Outlook Express and a browser active and visible at the same time. And with this monitor, you can rotate it 90 degrees and switch the video card output from landscape to portrait in seconds, giving you the extra height that you want. The monitor is from Dell, but other seller have models with similar specs.Moonbear said:At this point, I'd prefer getting at least the height dimension.