Discovering Binary Universe: Albert Einstein & Beyond

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a theory called the "Binary Universe," which posits that if space is flat, there are two universes: our own and a second one termed Universe B (UB). The theory suggests that black holes in our universe correspond to white holes in UB, and vice versa, explaining phenomena like the mysterious ejection of asteroids and comets. However, participants point out significant errors in the interpretation of modern physics, emphasizing that space is not literally flat and that personal theories require a solid understanding of established scientific principles. The conversation concludes with a reminder that personal theories are not permitted in the forum, leading to the thread's closure.
spacegeek101
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello. I have just regestered to tell the world of my amazing theory. I have called it, Binary universe. Albert Einstin said that everything puts a dent in spacetime. If sapce is flat, there is 2 sides witch means 2 universes. One is ours, an there's another one. I call it UB ( Universe B)
Black holes put a massive dent in time, not even light can escape. White holes make all light eject and no light can get to it. If the universe is flat, then on UB, where there is a black hole here, there's a white hole in UB. Its the same here, where there is a white hole here, there's a black hole in UB. Asteroids, comets, things fly out of white hole holes mistieriously. This theory explanes a lot. Another thing is, if there's a star somewhere in UB, there's white hole-like areas here.
 
Space news on Phys.org
No-one has ever observed a 'white-hole' in our universe, which by your theory means that the second universe must by neccessity be entirely white holes. What does it explain, and can you formulate your idea mathematically?
 
spacegeek101 said:
Hello. I have just regestered to tell the world of my amazing theory. I have called it, Binary universe. Albert Einstin said that everything puts a dent in spacetime. If sapce is flat, there is 2 sides witch means 2 universes. One is ours, an there's another one. I call it UB ( Universe B)
Black holes put a massive dent in time, not even light can escape. White holes make all light eject and no light can get to it. If the universe is flat, then on UB, where there is a black hole here, there's a white hole in UB. Its the same here, where there is a white hole here, there's a black hole in UB. Asteroids, comets, things fly out of white hole holes mistieriously. This theory explanes a lot. Another thing is, if there's a star somewhere in UB, there's white hole-like areas here.

Welcome to PF. I'm afraid you've made many errors in your interpretation of modern physics. Space is not flat, images of space as being flat are for explanatory purposes only, space is not literally a sheet with two sides.

I would advise learning some basic physics before trying to come up with hypothesis about the nature of the universe, the majority of practising physicists spend nearly ten years gaining degrees and a PhD before they really start applying themselves. It would be in your interest to read about what they have to say.
 
spacegeek101 said:
Hello. I have just regestered to tell the world of my amazing theory. I have called it, Binary universe. Albert Einstin said that everything puts a dent in spacetime. If sapce is flat, there is 2 sides witch means 2 universes. One is ours, an there's another one. I call it UB ( Universe B)
Black holes put a massive dent in time, not even light can escape. White holes make all light eject and no light can get to it. If the universe is flat, then on UB, where there is a black hole here, there's a white hole in UB. Its the same here, where there is a white hole here, there's a black hole in UB. Asteroids, comets, things fly out of white hole holes mistieriously. This theory explanes a lot. Another thing is, if there's a star somewhere in UB, there's white hole-like areas here.

Personal theories are not permitted here. Thread closed.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K