Disoersion relation and lattice constants

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the lattice constant for a 1D crystal and identifying the Bravais lattice for a 2D crystal based on given energy wavevector relations. The 1D relation is defined as E = u[n+(1/3)(-1)^n cos(kb)], while the 2D relation is E = u[n+(1/3)(-1)^n cos(kx b)Xcos(ky b)]. The participant expresses uncertainty about whether the variable 'b' represents the lattice constant and contemplates the necessity of transitioning to real space for accurate calculations. Additionally, they mention using MATLAB for plotting the lattice structure but seek analytical validation of their results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of lattice constants in solid-state physics
  • Familiarity with energy wavevector relations
  • Knowledge of Bravais lattices in crystallography
  • Proficiency in MATLAB for plotting and visualization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between lattice constants and energy wavevector relations in 1D and 2D crystals
  • Study the concept of Bravais lattices and their classification
  • Learn how to impose periodic boundary conditions in crystal calculations
  • Explore analytical methods for calculating lattice constants from wavefunctions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and students studying solid-state physics who are interested in lattice dynamics and crystal structure analysis.

pazmush
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Dispersion relation and lattice constants

I need to be able to calculate the period (which I believe is the lattice constant) for a 1D crystal given the energy wavevector relation. Is this possible?

I also have to find the Bravais lattice of a 2D crystal give a similar relation.

What is it that I have to calculate.

1D
E = u[n+(1/3)(-1)^n cos(kb)]

2D
E = u[n+(1/3)(-1)^n cos(kx b)Xcos(ky b)]

What I thought was that either b just is the lattice constant, or that you should impose the periodic boundary condition and calculate it that way, allthoigh all that did was cancel down to nothing so I'm not sure. Do I have to change to real space?

Also I've been able to plot it in MATLAB and allthough that shows a sort of lattice I'm not 100% sure that this is correct, and i'd like to be able to do it analytically.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K