Disproving vs Proving: Certainty of Results

  • Thread starter 15123
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses why it is easier to disprove something than to prove it, and why it can be more certain that something is untrue rather than true. It also touches on the idea of never being able to truly "prove" something in science, and the importance of multiple experiments to support a theory. The conversation then shifts to a discussion about a statistics question involving the "swan experiment" and the concept of direction of entropy, which states that it is easier to destroy than create.
  • #1
15123
12
0
Whyis it easier to disprove something than to prove something?

Why can you have more certainty of something being untrue?
Why is it hard to say something is true if the experiment's result yields it being true? Why is it a 'big maybe'?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
15123 said:
Whyis it easier to disprove something than to prove something?

Why can you have more certainty of something being untrue?
Why is it hard to say something is true if the experiment's result yields it being true? Why is it a 'big maybe'?

Are you asking a math question or a science question?

In math finding a counterexample is the easiest way to disprove something.

In science you can never "prove" anything. If the idea leads to many verifiable experiments then it could be an acceptable theory. One experiment may not be enough.
 
  • #3
It is a statistics question. I followed the example of the 'swan experiment'.
 
  • #4
15123 said:
It is a statistics question. I followed the example of the 'swan experiment'.
I am not familiar with the swan experiment. Does it have anything to do with black swans?
 
  • #5
Direction of Entropy

The direction of entropy: it is easier to destroy than create
 

FAQ: Disproving vs Proving: Certainty of Results

1. What is the difference between disproving and proving?

Disproving and proving are two different approaches to understanding the truth of a statement or hypothesis. Disproving involves finding evidence that contradicts the statement, while proving involves finding evidence that supports the statement.

2. Can a statement be both disproven and proven?

No, a statement cannot be both disproven and proven. If evidence is found that contradicts the statement, it is considered disproven. If evidence is found that supports the statement, it is considered proven.

3. How do scientists determine the certainty of results from disproving or proving?

The certainty of results from disproving or proving is determined through rigorous experimentation and analysis. Scientists use various methods such as statistical analysis, control groups, and replication to increase the reliability and validity of their results.

4. Is disproving or proving more important in scientific research?

Both disproving and proving are important in scientific research. Disproving helps scientists eliminate incorrect theories and focus on more accurate explanations, while proving helps scientists support their hypotheses and advance knowledge in their field.

5. How do scientists handle conflicting results from disproving and proving?

Conflicting results from disproving and proving can be a natural part of the scientific process. In this case, scientists will carefully examine the methods and data used to obtain the results and may conduct further experiments to reconcile the conflicting information. Ultimately, the most reliable and valid evidence will be used to support or refute a statement or hypothesis.

Similar threads

MHB Proving/Disproving "Every Pot Has a Lid
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Why are the inverse and converse of an implication not equivalent?
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
I Adding random numbers: Tolerance analysis
Replies
11
Views
1K
I Sample space, outcome, event, random variable, probability...
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Understanding La Disjonction de Cas Reasoning
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Probability, observers and the multiverse
Replies
3
Views
1K
MHB Operations on Sets: Proving A⊆B⊆C & A∪B=B∩C
Replies
2
Views
1K
Confidence intervals for two separate variables?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Would this experiment prove or disprove quantum randomness?
Replies
19
Views
1K
Apology and Disclaimer: Guidance in Quantum Interpretations
Replies
16
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top